A new report from The New York Times indicates that Supreme Court justices regularly incorporate data into their decisions that has no real factual backing. The justices use amicus briefs — ostensibly helpful but often ideologically motivated statements submitted by interested parties — when deciding cases, and those briefs are often not to be trusted:
Some of the factual assertions in recent amicus briefs would not pass muster in a high school research paper. But that has not stopped the Supreme Court from relying on them. Recent opinions have cited "facts" from amicus briefs that were backed up by blog posts, emails or nothing at all. [The New York Times]
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Magazine solutions - February 7, 2025Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - February 7, 2025
-
Magazine printables - February 7, 2025Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - February 7, 2025
-
Hands-on experiences that let travelers connect with the cultureThe Week Recommends Sharpen your sense of place through these engaging activities
-
Nobody seems surprised Wagner's Prigozhin died under suspicious circumstancesSpeed Read
-
Western mountain climbers allegedly left Pakistani porter to die on K2Speed Read
-
'Circular saw blades' divide controversial Rio Grande buoys installed by Texas governorSpeed Read
-
Los Angeles city workers stage 1-day walkout over labor conditionsSpeed Read
-
Mega Millions jackpot climbs to an estimated $1.55 billionSpeed Read
-
Bangladesh dealing with worst dengue fever outbreak on recordSpeed Read
-
Glacial outburst flooding in Juneau destroys homesSpeed Read
-
Scotland seeking 'monster hunters' to search for fabled Loch Ness creatureSpeed Read
