The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled unanimously that police in most cases must get a warrant before searching a cell phone. The decision involved two cases in which police had used information from suspects' cell phones to link them to crimes. The high court said the searches had been a violation of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Here's a portion of the ruling, written by Chief Justice John Roberts:
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
'A new era of hurricanes'Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
-
How Britain's demographic is changingA 50-year record population increase was fuelled by greater migration
-
The story of Japanese jeweller TasakiThe Blend A revival in the use of pearls in fashion and jewellery design places heritage brand Tasaki centre stage
-
Nobody seems surprised Wagner's Prigozhin died under suspicious circumstancesSpeed Read
-
Western mountain climbers allegedly left Pakistani porter to die on K2Speed Read
-
'Circular saw blades' divide controversial Rio Grande buoys installed by Texas governorSpeed Read
-
Los Angeles city workers stage 1-day walkout over labor conditionsSpeed Read
-
Mega Millions jackpot climbs to an estimated $1.55 billionSpeed Read
-
Bangladesh dealing with worst dengue fever outbreak on recordSpeed Read
-
Glacial outburst flooding in Juneau destroys homesSpeed Read
-
Scotland seeking 'monster hunters' to search for fabled Loch Ness creatureSpeed Read
