Supreme Court rules Spider-Man toy royalties belong to Marvel Enterprises, not inventor
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
The Supreme Court — and Justice Elena Kagan in particular — had some fun with the Kimble v. Marvel case, but have ultimately ruled that the inventor of Spider-Man cannot collect royalties for the Marvel Enterprises' Web Blaster toy due to his expired patent. The ruling upheld a precedent set by an older case, Brulotte v. Thys Co., and, according to the court, it was up to Congress to decide if royalties should be allowed to accrue after a patent expires.
Kagan, a self-described "avid comic book fan" whose favorite movie is The Avengers, wrote the opinion. "Patents endow their holders with certain superpowers, but only for a limited time," she cautioned.
The ruling was favored by six, with three justices dissenting.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Jeva Lange was the executive editor at TheWeek.com. She formerly served as The Week's deputy editor and culture critic. She is also a contributor to Screen Slate, and her writing has appeared in The New York Daily News, The Awl, Vice, and Gothamist, among other publications. Jeva lives in New York City. Follow her on Twitter.
