The New York Times' public editor says the paper's Clinton-DOJ story was a 'mess'

On Friday morning, The New York Times published a story alleging that the Department of Justice was pursuing a "criminal inquiry" into Hillary Clinton's use of a personal email account during her tenure as secretary of state. But as the story that "seemed like a blockbuster" spread over the internet, some crucial inaccuracies emerged: For one, Clinton was not the subject of the investigation — it was a more general investigation into whether government information in her personal emails was mishandled — and then the Times backed off the "criminal" aspect of the inquiry altogether, downgrading it to a "security referral."
"It was, to put it mildly, a mess," writes The New York Times' Public Editor Margaret Sullivan. Though The New York Times proceeded to issue not one, but two corrections, and the story underwent numerous modifications, "[y]ou can't put stories like this back in the bottle — they ripple through the entire news system," Sullivan says.
The Times attributed the mistaken reporting to sources with incorrect information, and Sullivan stands by the paper's admission, writing that, while unfortunate, it is "an explanation not an excuse."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Her advice for the future: simply wait.
Losing the story to another news outlet would have been a far, far better outcome than publishing an unfair story and damaging The Times' reputation for accuracy.What's more, when mistakes inevitably happen, the Times needs to be much more transparent with readers about what is going on. Just revising the story, and figuring out the corrections later, doesn't cut it. [The New York Times]
Read Sullivan's full critique here.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
NASA reveals ‘clearest sign of life’ on Mars yet
Speed Read The evidence came in the form of a rock sample collected on the planet
-
Former top FBI agents sue, claiming Trump purge
Speed Read The agents alleged they were targeted by a “campaign of retribution”
-
Conservative influencer Charlie Kirk shot dead at 31
Speed Read Kirk was holding a debate session at Utah Valley University
-
House posts lewd Epstein note attributed to Trump
Speed Read The estate of Jeffrey Epstein turned over the infamous 2003 birthday note from President Donald Trump
-
Supreme Court allows 'roving' race-tied ICE raids
Speed Read The court paused a federal judge's order barring agents from detaining suspected undocumented immigrants in LA based on race
-
South Korea to fetch workers detained in Georgia raid
Speed Read More than 300 South Korean workers detained in an immigration raid at a Hyundai plant will be released
-
DC sues Trump to end Guard 'occupation'
Speed Read D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues that the unsolicited military presence violates the law
-
RFK Jr. faces bipartisan heat in Senate hearing
Speed Read The health secretary defended his leadership amid CDC turmoil and deflected questions about the restricted availability of vaccines
-
White House defends boat strike as legal doubts mount
Speed Read Experts say there was no legal justification for killing 11 alleged drug-traffickers
-
Epstein accusers urge full file release, hint at own list
speed read A rally was organized by Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who are hoping to force a vote on their Epstein Files Transparency Act
-
Court hands Harvard a win in Trump funding battle
Speed Read The Trump administration was ordered to restore Harvard's $2 billion in research grants