Brett Kavanaugh's newly revealed 1998 questions for Bill Clinton are decidedly NSFW


On Monday, the National Archives released an August 1998 memo Brett Kavanaugh wrote to his boss, Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, slamming President Bill Clinton and posing 10 questions he wanted Starr's investigators to ask Clinton. Seven of the 10 questions sought confirmation of graphic details about Clinton's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, including questions about oral sex and masturbation. The memo also reflected the growing tensions between Clinton and Starr's office — Kavanaugh, now President Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court, was an associate counsel.
"I am strongly opposed to giving the president any 'break' in the questioning regarding the details of the Lewinsky relationship" unless he "resigns" or "confesses perjury," Kavanaugh wrote to Starr. He criticized Clinton's "frivolous privilege claims" and said "he has lied to his aides. He has lied to the American people. He has tried to disgrace you and this office with a sustained propaganda campaign that would make Nixon blush."
The strident tenor and vulgar content of the memo provide "a contrast to the genial, soft-spoken nominee who chooses every word carefully as he makes the rounds of the Senate before his Sept. 4 hearing before the Judiciary Committee," says The Washington Post, which obtained the memo through a Freedom of Information Act request. It also highlights the stark evolution Kavanaugh has gone through from backing vigorous prosecution of presidents to arguing, after five years in the George W. Bush White House, that presidents should only be prosecuted after they leave office.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
This shift, newly relevant as Trump clashes with Special Counsel Robert Mueller, will likely be raised during Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings. "Either his views really have changed over time to reflect far more of a belief in the importance of protecting presidential prerogative," University of Texas law professor Stephen Vladeck tells the Post, "or his views on presidential prerogative differ depending on what he thinks about the current officeholder."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
How clean-air efforts may have exacerbated global warming
Under the Radar Air pollution artificially cooled the Earth, ‘masking’ extent of temperature increase
-
September 14 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Sunday’s political cartoons include RFK Jr on the hook, the destruction of discourse, and more
-
Air strikes in the Caribbean: Trump’s murky narco-war
Talking Point Drug cartels ‘don’t follow Marquess of Queensberry Rules’, but US military air strikes on speedboats rely on strained interpretation of ‘invasion’
-
House posts lewd Epstein note attributed to Trump
Speed Read The estate of Jeffrey Epstein turned over the infamous 2003 birthday note from President Donald Trump
-
Supreme Court allows 'roving' race-tied ICE raids
Speed Read The court paused a federal judge's order barring agents from detaining suspected undocumented immigrants in LA based on race
-
South Korea to fetch workers detained in Georgia raid
Speed Read More than 300 South Korean workers detained in an immigration raid at a Hyundai plant will be released
-
DC sues Trump to end Guard 'occupation'
Speed Read D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues that the unsolicited military presence violates the law
-
RFK Jr. faces bipartisan heat in Senate hearing
Speed Read The health secretary defended his leadership amid CDC turmoil and deflected questions about the restricted availability of vaccines
-
White House defends boat strike as legal doubts mount
Speed Read Experts say there was no legal justification for killing 11 alleged drug-traffickers
-
Epstein accusers urge full file release, hint at own list
speed read A rally was organized by Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who are hoping to force a vote on their Epstein Files Transparency Act
-
Court hands Harvard a win in Trump funding battle
Speed Read The Trump administration was ordered to restore Harvard's $2 billion in research grants