Why Democrats are brushing off Elizabeth Warren's finance staffing shuffle

(Image credit: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

published 1 April 2019

Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (D-Mass.) big-money sidestep may not be a big deal after all.

On Sunday, The New York Times reported that the Warren campaign's finance director Michael Pratt resigned because the 2020 contender pledged to only pursue individual donations. Pratt reportedly suggested Warren would fail without a consistent stream of big money, but Democrats have quickly come to her defense to say that's not true.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

It's true that Warren is still polling in the upper end of the 2020 Democratic spectrum, and that she keeps cranking out policy proposals like she's already in office. Still, the Times article rightly pointed out that Warren is "struggl[ing] in early fundraising." Pete Buttigieg, who joined the 2020 race in January as a longshot, reported Monday that he'd raised $7 million so far — about as much as Warren has reported taking in since her November launch.

Explore More

Kathryn is a graduate of Syracuse University, with degrees in magazine journalism and information technology, along with hours to earn another degree after working at SU's independent paper The Daily Orange. She's currently recovering from a horse addiction while living in New York City, and likes to share her extremely dry sense of humor on Twitter.

Subscribe to The Week

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox