This is why Mueller didn't force Trump to testify
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Special Counsel Robert Mueller never had an in-person interview with President Trump for his investigation into Russian election interference, and he didn't think he needed it.
Attorney General William Barr released a redacted version of Mueller's report on Thursday, including information from numerous interviews with Trump's associates, but only written answers from the president himself. Mueller's team found Trump's written answers to be "inadequate," and wrote in the report that they "considered whether to issue a subpoena for his testimony."
But by the time this question arose, the "investigation had made significant progress," Mueller's team wrote. So the investigators "determined" that the information they gathered from other sources "allowed us to draw relevant and factual conclusions on intent and credibility ... without direct testimony from the subject of the investigation," the report continues.
Article continues belowThe Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Read the whole report here.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Kathryn is a graduate of Syracuse University, with degrees in magazine journalism and information technology, along with hours to earn another degree after working at SU's independent paper The Daily Orange. She's currently recovering from a horse addiction while living in New York City, and likes to share her extremely dry sense of humor on Twitter.
