Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) is looking to crack down on video game companies he says "exploit" children with in-game purchases.
The Missouri senator on Wednesday announced he will introduce the Protecting Children from Abusive Games Act to ban the use of "pay-to-win" monetization practices and loot boxes in video games aimed at children.
“When a game is designed for kids, game developers shouldn't be allowed to monetize addiction," he said in a statement. "And when kids play games designed for adults, they should be walled off from compulsive microtransactions."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Latest Videos FromThe Week
The phrase "pay-to-win" is used to refer to video games in which players are encouraged to spend money in order to achieve gameplay advantages. Hawley's bill is also looking to ban loot boxes, a game feature that allows players to pay real money for a selection of randomized items. This practice, the senator argues, combines "the addictive properties of pay-to-win with the compulsive behavior inherent in other forms of gambling."
As a "notorious example," Hawley cites Candy Crush, the popular puzzle game that is free to play but sells in-game purchases to make the game easier, including one that costs $150. The bill applies to any games "targeted at those under the age of 18," as well as those "with wider audiences whose developers knowingly allow minor players to engage in microtransactions," the senator says in a press release.
The Entertainment Software Association, a lobbying group, told Kotaku that the industry already has the tools to keep "the control of in-game spending in parents' hands," saying parents "have the ability to limit or prohibit in-game purchases with easy to use parental controls."
