DNC will reportedly reject Iowa and Nevada's vote-by-phone 'virtual' caucus plans. Iowa isn't thrilled.

(Image credit: Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images)

published 30 August 2019

Earlier this year, the Democratic National Committee required that state parties open their caucuses to a broader range of voters, especially those unable to attend caucus gatherings, and in June, the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee gave conditional approval to plans for Iowa and Nevada to hold "virtual" caucuses that allow Democrats to call in their votes. Now, the DNC will recommend those plans be rejected due to security and hacking concerns, The Associated Press and the Des Moines Register report.

If the Rules and Bylaw Committee agrees and rejects the plans, that leaves little time to come up with and implement a new system before Iowa's first-in-the-nation primary vote on Feb. 3. In fact, the Register reports, it could endanger Iowa's coveted electoral pole position:

The virtual caucus plan also was intended to work with New Hampshire, which follows Iowa in the presidential nominating process and has long balked at any changes that make Iowa's caucuses look too much like its primary.New Hampshire law allows its secretary of state to change the date of its primary so that it precedes any other state's primary by at least one week. As long as Iowa holds a caucus and doesn't veer too far into primary territory, it can maintain its coveted position as "first in the nation" .... If Iowa can’t come up with a plan for people to participate without being physically present that differs substantially from a primary, the future of Iowa’s first-in-the-nation status could be thrown into question. [Des Moines Register]

The DNC has said it will approve or reject each state's primary plan by Sept. 13. Jim Roosevelt, chairman of the Rules and Bylaws Committee, told AP there are security concerns about the virtual caucus proposals, but didn't rule out some form of remote participation. Iowa's first-in-the-nation status isn't actually that old, the Regiester's Kathie Obradovich explains below, but it is jealously guarded. Peter Weber

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Explore More

To continue reading this article...

Create a free account

Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.

Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.

Cancel or pause at any time.

Already a subscriber to The Week?

Unlimited website access is included with Digital and Print + Digital subscriptions.
with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.

Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us

Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.

Subscribe to The Week

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox