Depending on who you ask, President Trump was either "happy" with acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney admitting on Thursday that President Trump used military aid as leverage to pressure Ukraine into launching an investigation into Democrats, or enraged.
Mulvaney made the jaw-dropping acknowledgment during a press conference, shortly after making another astounding announcement: that next year's G7 summit will be held at Trump's Doral resort in Miami. New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman reported Thursday night that Mulvaney was told to break the Doral news because aides thought it would look bad if Trump did it, plus he could field a few Ukraine questions.
People with knowledge of the matter said Mulvaney was prepared to go "a certain way on Ukraine, but wasn't supposed to suggest a quid pro quo," Haberman reported. Trump apparently saw some of the press conference, and was "happy with how Mulvaney did and sent him that message," she added, but Trump's legal team was irate, and advisers told him that Mulvaney's admission was a major problem. Trump told his advisers to handle it, Haberman said, and Mulvaney worked with the White House communications team to come up with a retraction to his public admission.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Two CNN reporters are hearing things a little differently. Shimon Prokupecz tweeted that Mulvaney only had a short briefing with White House aides regarding impeachment questions, and they "did not expect he would go as far as he did in describing the freeze of aid to Ukraine." His colleague Jim Acosta was told that Trump was "not happy" with Mulvaney's performance. If Mulvaney is out by Halloween, we'll know where Trump stands.
-
Strava vs. Garmin: the row splitting the running communityUnder The Radar The legal dispute between the two titans of exercise tech is like ‘Mom and Dad fighting’
-
Bad Bunny: Why MAGA is incensedFeature The NFL announced Latino artist Bad Bunny as the Super Bowl halftime headliner, sparking MAGA outrage
-
Supreme Court: Judging 20 years of RobertsFeature Two decades after promising to “call balls and strikes,” Chief Justice John Roberts faces scrutiny for reshaping American democracy
-
News organizations reject Pentagon restrictionsSpeed Read The proposed policy is Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s latest move to limit press access at the Pentagon
-
Trump declares end to Gaza war, ‘dawn’ of new MideastSpeed Read Hamas freed the final 20 living Israeli hostages and Israel released thousands of Palestinian detainees
-
Trump DOJ indicts New York AG Letitia JamesSpeed Read New York Attorney General Letitia James was indicted as Trump’s Justice Department pursues charges against his political opponents
-
Judge blocks Trump’s Guard deployment in ChicagoSpeed Read The president is temporarily blocked from federalizing the Illinois National Guard or deploying any Guard units in the state
-
Trump urges jail for Illinois, Chicago leadersSpeed Read The Texas National Guard begin operations in the Chicago area
-
Bondi stonewalls on Epstein, Comey in Senate face-offSpeed Read Attorney General Pam Bondi denied charges of using the Justice Department in service of Trump’s personal vendettas
-
Court allows Trump’s Texas troops to head to ChicagoSpeed Read Trump is ‘using our service members as pawns in his illegal effort to militarize our nation’s cities,’ said Gov. J.B. Pritzker
-
Judge bars Trump’s National Guard moves in OregonSpeed Read In an emergency hearing, a federal judge blocked President Donald Trump from sending National Guard troops into Portland
