Attorney General Barr is intervening in Roger Stone's case and others important to Trump, officials say
A lot happened Tuesday at the Justice Department.
In a span of about 12 hours, the Justice Department revised downward the sentencing guidelines issued late Monday for Roger Stone, a longtime friend and adviser to President Trump who was convicted of felonies committed to help Trump; the four career federal prosecutors on the case all abruptly withdrew and one of them quit the Justice Department; and Trump quietly rescinded a Treasury Department nomination for Jessie Liu, the former U.S. attorney in Washington who oversaw the Stone case and others of interest to Trump, until she was suddenly pulled from her job in late January and replaced by a longtime close adviser to Attorney General William Barr, Timothy Shea.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Justice Department and Trump both denied that the switch to recommend leniency for Stone was in response to Trump's early Tuesday tweet demanding leniency or any direct order. But former Justice Department officials called the move unprecedented and frankly alarming. "There is no way you can come away from this with anything other than an impression that Justice is taking its orders from the president and pandering to the president," former DOJ official Mary McCord told the Post. Maddow described it as at least a constitutional near-crisis, and Nicolle Wallace said Trump is teeing up pardons for Stone, Flynn, and everyone else convicted due to Special Counsel Robert Muller's investigation.
Journalist Marcy Wheeler suggested that "the brazenness of this fight may be a reflection of the damaging information Roger Stone may have about Trump’s own conduct," for reasons she explains, and CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin called the official Justice Department rationale laughable and said in some ways, a pardon would be preferable to meddling in the sentencing guidelines because instead of just sullying his own name, Trump is besmirching the Justice Department. Peter Weber
-
Villa Treville Positano: a glamorous sanctuary on the Amalfi CoastThe Week Recommends Franco Zeffirelli’s former private estate is now one of Italy’s most exclusive hotels
-
How roadkill is a surprising boon to scientific researchUnder the radar We can learn from animals without trapping and capturing them
-
Why quitting your job is so difficult in JapanUnder the Radar Reluctance to change job and rise of ‘proxy quitters’ is a reaction to Japan’s ‘rigid’ labour market – but there are signs of change
-
Trump sues IRS for $10B over tax record leaksSpeed Read The president is claiming ‘reputational and financial harm’ from leaks of his tax information between 2018 and 2020
-
Trump, Senate Democrats reach DHS funding dealSpeed Read The deal will fund most of the government through September and the Department of Homeland Security for two weeks
-
Fed holds rates steady, bucking Trump pressureSpeed Read The Federal Reserve voted to keep its benchmark interest rate unchanged
-
Judge slams ICE violations amid growing backlashSpeed Read ‘ICE is not a law unto itself,’ said a federal judge after the agency violated at least 96 court orders
-
Rep. Ilhan Omar attacked with unknown liquidSpeed Read This ‘small agitator isn’t going to intimidate me from doing my work’
-
Democrats pledge Noem impeachment if not firedSpeed Read Trump is publicly defending the Homeland Security secretary
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Hegseth moves to demote Sen. Kelly over videospeed read Retired Navy fighter pilot Mark Kelly appeared in a video reminding military service members that they can ‘refuse illegal orders’
