A lot happened Tuesday at the Justice Department.
In a span of about 12 hours, the Justice Department revised downward the sentencing guidelines issued late Monday for Roger Stone, a longtime friend and adviser to President Trump who was convicted of felonies committed to help Trump; the four career federal prosecutors on the case all abruptly withdrew and one of them quit the Justice Department; and Trump quietly rescinded a Treasury Department nomination for Jessie Liu, the former U.S. attorney in Washington who oversaw the Stone case and others of interest to Trump, until she was suddenly pulled from her job in late January and replaced by a longtime close adviser to Attorney General William Barr, Timothy Shea.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The Justice Department and Trump both denied that the switch to recommend leniency for Stone was in response to Trump's early Tuesday tweet demanding leniency or any direct order. But former Justice Department officials called the move unprecedented and frankly alarming. "There is no way you can come away from this with anything other than an impression that Justice is taking its orders from the president and pandering to the president," former DOJ official Mary McCord told the Post. Maddow described it as at least a constitutional near-crisis, and Nicolle Wallace said Trump is teeing up pardons for Stone, Flynn, and everyone else convicted due to Special Counsel Robert Muller's investigation.
Journalist Marcy Wheeler suggested that "the brazenness of this fight may be a reflection of the damaging information Roger Stone may have about Trump’s own conduct," for reasons she explains, and CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin called the official Justice Department rationale laughable and said in some ways, a pardon would be preferable to meddling in the sentencing guidelines because instead of just sullying his own name, Trump is besmirching the Justice Department. Peter Weber
-
Court allows Trump’s Texas troops to head to ChicagoSpeed Read Trump is ‘using our service members as pawns in his illegal effort to militarize our nation’s cities,’ said Gov. J.B. Pritzker
-
Judge bars Trump’s National Guard moves in OregonSpeed Read In an emergency hearing, a federal judge blocked President Donald Trump from sending National Guard troops into Portland
-
Museum head ousted after Trump sword gift denialSpeed Read Todd Arrington, who led the Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library and Museum, denied the Trump administration a sword from the collection as a gift for King Charles
-
Trump declares ‘armed conflict’ with drug cartelsspeed read This provides a legal justification for recent lethal military strikes on three alleged drug trafficking boats
-
Supreme Court rules for Fed’s Cook in Trump feudSpeed Read Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook can remain in her role following Trump’s attempts to oust her
-
Judge rules Trump illegally targeted Gaza protestersSpeed Read The Trump administration’s push to arrest and deport international students for supporting Palestine is deemed illegal
-
Trump: US cities should be military ‘training grounds’Speed Read In a hastily assembled summit, Trump said he wants the military to fight the ‘enemy within’ the US
-
US government shuts down amid health care standoffSpeed Read Democrats said they won’t vote for a deal that doesn’t renew Affordable Care Act health care subsidies
