Syrians are awaiting the results of their first elections since the fall of Bashar al-Assad, which authorities hope will represent a new chapter for the war-torn country. But while Sunday’s limited vote was a “historic moment” after the oppressive rule of Assad, said Al Jazeera, the electoral process “has been subject to debate”.
How did the elections work? In the new People’s Assembly, a third of the 210 seats will be directly appointed by Syria’s interim leader, President Ahmed al-Sharaa, with Sunday’s vote deciding the remainder.
However, only members of electoral colleges appointed by an elections committee to represent the country’s 60 districts were eligible to vote: a total of around 7,000 people. In 10 of those districts, in the Druze-majority Sweida province and Kurdish-controlled areas in the north, the vote was indefinitely postponed due to what the central government in Damascus described as the danger posed by ongoing sectarian violence in the regions.
Were they a success? With so few people eligible to vote, there were “few signs in Syria on Sunday that an election was taking place”, said The National. “No rallies preceded the poll and there were no election manifestos or campaigns by any parties.” This was “an indirect election using a set of electors who have basically been handpicked by the current rulers”, Syria expert Aron Lund, a fellow at the Century International think tank, told Al Jazeera.
President Sharaa admitted that the process was not perfect but said it “suited the phase Syria is undergoing”. Authorities claim that mass displacement and administrative chaos resulting from 14 years of civil war, and the sudden fall of the Assad regime last December, made holding a nationwide election impossible.
Who will make up Syria’s next government? Given their close affiliation with the Assad regime, all existing political parties were dissolved when the interim government took power, so every candidate in the election ran as an independent.
While there are no quotas for representation, the majority of seats – 70% – will go to academics and experts, underlining the aim of creating a technocratic government rather than one dominated by members of prominent families. |