The Week The Week
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/skoGBi9qKFoUtnNWkovjJQ.jpg

SUBSCRIBE

Try 6 Free Issues

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • Talking Points
  • The Week Recommends
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletters
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • The Week Evening Review
    Problems with Prevent, poppy wars, and Putin’s submarines

     
    TODAY’S BIG QUESTION

    Why is Prevent no longer fit for purpose?

    The government’s early intervention scheme to stop people becoming terrorists is “no longer keeping the country safe”, the Independent Commission for Countering Terrorism has concluded. The present approach is “not fit for purpose” and needs a “radical overhaul”, said the commission’s chair Declan Morgan, a former chief justice of Northern Ireland, following a wide-ranging review.

    Yet Prevent referrals are piling up; rising from 6,922 to 8,778 in a year, to reach the highest level since records began in 2015.

    What did the commentators say?
    The three-year review found that the kind of people presenting a terror threat have “morphed” from “groups such as al-Qaida or Islamic State to ‘self-initiated’ individuals with ‘complex, mixed, unclear or unstable ideologies’”, said Deborah Haynes on Sky News. It recommends “narrowing the definition of what constitutes terrorism to provide greater clarity”.

    One of Prevent’s key flaws is that it is “built on the assumption that violence stems from ideology”, said Limor Simhony Philpott on UnHerd, and on the principle that “if we detect and disrupt belief systems, we can stop attacks”. But the terror landscape has shifted: what “binds” today’s radicalised young men is not ideology but “rage and contempt”. This “new reality poses a serious problem” for a scheme focused on “spotting ideological markers” to identify those who pose a risk.

    Southport killer Axel Rudakubana is a prime example of “this new kind of threat”. He was referred to Prevent three times (once aged 13 and twice aged 14) but, as he “didn’t fit the mould of most extremists” and did not follow a “coherent political or religious cause”, he wasn’t identified as a risk.

    Prevent is “overwhelmed” by the number of referrals it now receives, said Ian Acheson in The Spectator. It has become a “repository” for troubled individuals who have been “failed by every other state agency”. It is “turning into a giant safeguarding creche, permanently distracted from its core aim” because it is “offsetting the failures of other institutions”.

    What next?
    Officials are said to be engaging “positively” with the new report, although it has no statutory underpinning, said Rozina Sabur in The Telegraph. The authorities are “open to adopting at least some of its recommendations”.

     
     
    THE EXPLAINER

    Vladimir Putin’s ‘nuclear tsunami’ missile

    Russia has successfully tested an underwater nuclear-torpedo powerful enough to “put entire states out of operation”, according to Vladimir Putin. Speaking at an event for Ukraine war veterans last week, the Russian president said “there is nothing like” the Poseidon missile.

    What is the weapon?
    Russia’s new nuclear submarine, Khabarovsk, is armed with autonomous Poseidon missiles. Said to be 20 metres long and nearly two metres wide, they are capable of travelling up to 6,200 miles at speeds of up to 115mph, deep below the surface of the water.

    Experts believe the weapon breaks “most of the traditional nuclear deterrence and classification rules”, said The Guardian. “Launched from a submarine like a torpedo”, the missile is thought to be “able to loiter as an underwater drone” before deploying a nuclear warhead “capable of triggering a radioactive tsunami to render coastal cities uninhabitable”.
    Recent estimates indicate a bomb of two megatons, said Naval News – roughly 100 times more powerful than the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.

    What did Moscow say?
    There’s “nothing like this in the world in terms of the speed and the depth of the movement of this unmanned vehicle”, Putin claimed, and there are “no ways to intercept” it. Defence Minister Andrei Belousov said Khabarovsk and its missiles would “enable” Russia to “successfully secure” its maritime borders and “protect its national interests in various parts of the world’s oceans”.

    A report on Russian television boasted that one Poseidon missile could cause enough damage to “plunge Britain into the depths of the sea”, said the Daily Mail.


    A new nuclear arms race?
    News of the launch prompted Donald Trump to order the US military to restart nuclear tests for the first time in 33 years, although he said the US would do so on “an equal basis” to other countries. As neither China nor Russia has carried out an “actual explosive nuclear test”, Trump “probably” means “reciprocal testing of nuclear-capable missiles”, said The Telegraph.

    His announcement still “bolstered concerns” that the world is “sliding into a new nuclear arms race”, said the Financial Times. A return to US testing “would be a highly retrograde step”, providing a premise for other states to ramp up their nuclear weapons programmes, and encouraging non-nuclear states to “pursue their own”.

     
     
    QUOTE OF THE DAY

    “I see the free press under pressure. I see the weaponisation. I think we have to fight for our journalism.”

    Tim Davie rallies BBC employees during an all-staff call today, after Donald Trump threatened to sue the broadcaster for $1 billion. “We have made some mistakes” but “we will get through it and we will thrive”, the outgoing director general said.

     
     

    Poll watch

    More than four in ten (44%) Israelis believe Donald Trump’s administration has more influence over their nation’s security decisions than their own government, according to the Israel Democracy Institute’s latest monthly Israeli Voice Index. The survey of more than 750 Jewish and Arab Israelis also found that fewer than half believe Hamas will hand control of the Gaza Strip to a multinational body.

     
     
    Talking Point

    Has ‘poppy politics’ got out of hand?

    As the nation once again marks Remembrance Day, “performative poppy wearing” has become “toxic”, said Helen Coffey in The Independent. Anyone “foolish/thoughtless/bold enough” to show their face on television in November without “a scarlet talisman pinned proudly to their chest” faces a “public shaming”.

    And the vitriol “hurled at people purely for the absence of a £2 paper flower” has turned the poppy “from a well-meaning show of support into another piece of weaponised propaganda”.

    ‘Vile abuse’
    Prince William has urged young people to wear a poppy because it’s “not just about the past, it’s about shaping who we become in the future” and learning from “the courage of others”.

    But others are using a “bastardisation” of the poppy’s meaning for their own ends, said James Ball in The New World. The “policing of who is and who isn’t wearing” them feels “less about solemn thanks and more about the same kind of nationalism” that has seen England and Union Jack flags “hung up in their hundreds from lamp-posts”.

    “Spewing vile abuse at others in the name of patriotism” is surely an “insult to the memory” of the fallen soldiers who “fought for freedom of speech”, said Coffey.

    ‘Divisively politicised’
    Some people are opting to wear a pacifist white poppy, but this alternative is also proving controversial. The “vast majority” of the people are “rightly angered by the white poppy” brigade, said Hamish de Bretton-Gordon in The Telegraph. The Peace Pledge Union, which distributes them, “explicitly” supports “de-funding the Armed Forces”, yet white-poppy wearers such as actor Mark Rylance (pictured above) “can only exist in safety because the Armed Forces stand ready to go to war”.

    I’m “troubled” by how the poppy has “become divisively politicised”, said military veteran Ian Cumming in The Herald. It “jars” when “people with no experience of service” either “use the poppy as a test of loyalty” or “reject it to make a political point”. Service personnel put themselves at risk “in defence of our way of life” and, in return, we owe them “gratitude, respect and enduring support”. The poppy should be a visual reminder of that, not a “prop for argument and point-scoring”.

    “For those of us who have faced the harsh realities of war, Remembrance is not a performance – it’s a promise.” 

     
     

    Good day 🙏

    … for lawmakers, after the US Senate passed a funding bill that could end the country’s record-breaking government shutdown. Eight Democrats joined all but one Republican in voting for the deal, which still needs to be approved by the House of Representatives and then signed into law by Donald Trump. 

     
     

    Bad day🚓

    … for criminals, after more than 920 people were arrested in a UK-wide crackdown on high-street crime. Police raided more than 2,700 mini-marts, vape shops, barbers and other cash-rich businesses suspected of acting as fronts for money laundering, in an unprecedented month-long operation led by the National Crime Agency.

     
     
    picture of the day

    Open season

    Revellers celebrate the start of the Carnival season in the German city of Cologne. The week-long nationwide party, known as the “fifth season”, traditionally begins at 11 minutes past 11 on 11 November.

    Ina Fassbender / AFP / Getty Images

     
     
    Puzzles

    Daily crossword

    Test your general knowledge with The Week’s daily crossword, part of our puzzles section, which also includes sudoku and codewords

    Play here

     
     
    THE WEEK RECOMMENDS

    Best Caribbean cruises for a last-minute winter break

    Comprising more than 7,000 picture-perfect islands, the Caribbean has almost infinite attractions, with cruises stopping everywhere from Barbados to Cuba. And where better to escape the UK’s chilly winter weather?

    Royal Caribbean
    Royal Caribbean’s Western Caribbean cruise “blends vibrant culture, sun-soaked landscapes, and easy-going luxury”, said Condé Nast Traveler. Passengers board in Galveston, Texas, before sailing “straight into the heart of the Caribbean”. Departing in January, the five-night itinerary offers ample opportunities to “unwind on white-sand beaches”.  

    Explora Journeys
    This luxury line, a sister brand to MSC Cruises, is a “relatively new name in Caribbean waters”, said The Telegraph. For a pre-Christmas escape, consider the 14 December departure from Bridgetown, Barbados. The eight-night trip blends the “Gallic chic of French island Martinique” with the “castaway feel of tiny Bequia in the Grenadines”. There’s also a stop in the “so-called Emerald Isle of Montserrat”, famed for its Irish heritage and “volatile” volcano.

    Silversea
    Silversea’s sparkling new ship Silver Ray offers eight restaurants for onboard dining during an array of luxurious, all-inclusive voyages. Depart from Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and enjoy a “wide selection of shore excursions” at each destination, said The Times. In St Kitts and Nevis, adventurous guests can zipline through the rainforest or snorkel amid “volcanic rock formations”.

    Disney Cruise
    When it comes to family cruising, no one does it better than Disney. Its voyages put “youngsters at the heart of everything”, said The Telegraph. Departing in February from Fort Lauderdale, this five-night sailing features “jungle escapades and jeep safaris”, and visits Disney’s private island, Castaway Cay in the Bahamas, where surprise appearances by Disney characters “ramp up the fun factor”.

     
     

    Statistic of the day

    5%: The UK’s unemployment rate, according to latest ONS figures – the highest level since the pandemic. Revised tax data shows a reduction of 180,000 payrolled staff since Rachel Reeves’ Budget last October and analysts are warning of a worsening slowdown in the jobs market ahead of her Budget later this month.

     
     
    instant opinion

    Today’s best commentary

    The World Bank should focus on poverty, not climate change
    Bjørn Lomborg in City A.M.
    The US “has told the World Bank to stop obsessing about climate and get back to its core business of ending poverty”, writes the Copenhagen Consensus Center think tank’s Bjørn Lomborg. The UK “should get on board with this commonsense call”. In the world’s poorest regions, “core development investments” such as “improving maternal health” deliver “greater and faster benefits” than climate projects. “Raiding development funds for climate initiatives” is an “affront to human suffering”. 

    The BBC Thought It Could Save Itself by Serving the Powerful. It Was Wrong
    Steven Methven on Novara Media
    The BBC’s “error” in the Donald Trump “edit” controversy has been “messing with the big dogs it customarily serves”, writes Steven Methven. The broadcaster has always prized a “bogus notion” of its impartiality, even when reality “very much has a side”. If “your journalism is less concerned with the truth than pandering to every political faction, no matter how destructive”, please “don’t come crying to me if power hits back when you fail to pander hard enough”. 

    There’s nothing uncool about having someone to make you sausage pasta
    Gabriella Bennett in The Times
    Vogue “has declared it uncool to have a boyfriend,” writes Gabriella Bennett. I’m “about as romantic as a washing machine”, but “I know this cannot be right”.  “Loving and wanting to be loved” shouldn’t feel “like a hangover from old-fashioned times”.  Apparently, it’s “tacky to boast” online “about a soulmate in the era of toxic dating”.  But “I want to see my friends happy” and “to know there’s someone” making them dinner “after a rough day”.

     
     
    word of the day

    Hyphen

    A punctuation mark missing from Andrew Mountbatten Windsor’s name when it was announced by Buckingham Palace. But, following a request for clarification from The Times, the Palace is reportedly considering introducing a hyphen, to match the double-barrelled surname that was created to merge Prince Philip’s family name with that of the Windsors.

     
     

    Evening Review was written and edited by Harriet Marsden, Hollie Clemence, Rebecca Messina, Will Barker, Chas Newkey-Burden, Irenie Forshaw, Natalie Holmes, Helen Brown and Kari Wilkin, with illustrations by Stephen Kelly.

    Image credits, from top: illustration by Stephen Kelly / Shutterstock; Russian Defense Ministry / Anadolu / Getty Images; Matthew Chattle / Future Publishing / Getty Images; POTD, Eric Laudonien / Alamy

    Morning Report and Evening Review were named Newsletter of the Year at the Publisher Newsletter Awards 2025
     

    Recent editions

    • Morning Report

      Trump threatens BBC with $1bn lawsuit

    • Evening Review

      A political coup at the BBC?

    • Morning Report

      BBC bosses exit amid bias row

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • FAQ
    Add as a preferred source on Google

    The Week UK is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.