The Week The Week
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jzblygzdxr1769609154.gif

SUBSCRIBE

Try 6 weeks free

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • Talking Points
  • The Week Recommends
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletters
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • Sunday Shortlist, from The Week
    Spielberg’s ‘corker’ and a ‘riveting’ exhibition

     
    FILM REVIEW

    Disclosure Day 

    Emily Blunt is ‘fantastic’ in Steven Spielberg’s alien drama

    When the “spine-tingling” trailer for Steven Spielberg’s “Disclosure Day” was released, many of us hoped that the great director would be delivering his “career-crowning masterpiece”, said Nicholas Barber on BBC Culture: a “profound last word” on aliens arriving on Earth, a topic that has obsessed him for years. Instead, we have a “flimsy, outdated car-chase thriller” that contains “no ideas about aliens that we haven’t heard before”.

    Josh O’Connor stars as Daniel Kellner, a cybersecurity boffin who works for Wardex, a powerful US organisation that has for years been concealing proof of alien contact (yes, on one level it is “Men in Black”, but without the jokes). After stealing classified files, he becomes a fugitive pursued by Wardex’s sinister supremo (Colin Firth, “badly miscast”).

    Instrumental to Kellner’s plan to expose Wardex is Margaret Fairchild (Emily Blunt), a television meteorologist who suddenly finds herself able to speak to aliens. Her scenes are “fantastic”: Spielberg should probably have made the film about her powers and “ditched the rest”.

    There’s plenty of the director’s “signature elegance” to enjoy, said Robbie Collin in The Telegraph; some scenes move “with such breathless lucidity it is as if he is beaming excitement directly into your brain”. But the plotting is “woolly and lopsided”, while the tone is “an awkward mix of solemnity and silliness”.

    I enjoyed it, said David Sexton in The New Statesman – it’s “as brilliantly filmed as anything Spielberg has ever made”, with a “marvellous” performance from Blunt and a “terrific” score from John Williams (his 30th for Spielberg). It’s a “corker, a proper summer blockbuster” and “a prime example of the genre he originally created with ‘Jaws’”.

     
     
    EXHIBITION REVIEW

    Marilyn Monroe: A Portrait

    ‘Perfectly conceived’ show celebrating what would have been star’s 100th birthday

    Marilyn Monroe and David Attenborough were both born in 1926, said Waldemar Januszczak in The Times. If things had gone differently, we might be celebrating her 100th birthday this year as well as his. But “some candles were not made for lengthy flickering” and now, instead of a party, “we have a Marilyn blockbuster” at the National Portrait Gallery that is “packed to the rafters with her image”.

    The show “goes down various alleys and has several twists. But it ends up coming to the simplest of conclusions: boy, did the camera love her.” It explores her photographic legacy in a clever way, grouping the “seemingly countless portraits” according to the photographers who took the pictures. It also insistently reminds us of Monroe’s own agency in creating her image: the exhibition casts her as a “self-made figure”. Born Norma Jeane Mortenson, she grew up poor, with an unstable mother and an absent father, and was passed from foster home to orphanage. But even from the early days, she “knew how she wanted to be seen”.

    “Marilyn was acting for the camera long before she ever appeared on screen,” said Laura Cumming in The Observer. The earliest picture here is essentially a teenage self-portrait, taken in a photo booth: she’s yet to adopt her “trademark blonde hair” but she already has the “joyously open smile” and perfect teeth of legend. Picture by picture, she develops the look for which we remember her – and “a star is born”.

    “You think you know her face, but each new image overturns the last.” She collaborates with each new photographer: “more intellectual with Eve Arnold, more intimate with Cecil Beaton, more seductive with Sam Shaw”. We variously see her “finger-to-temple over a book”; “tensely concentrated in a morning headstand”; “glacially glamorous in furs, or casually conversational in the back yard”.

    Yet she is always herself in the photos – a quality the various paintings of her here fail to replicate. There are “tearful” pop-art homages by Peter Blake and Pauline Boty, and an “awful” portrait by Willem de Kooning that sees her as “a cock-eyed doll”. The “arc of this riveting show” is “perfectly conceived”, and as you reach the tragic finale, you cannot fail “to be intensely moved”.

    It is moving, said Charlotte Jansen in The Guardian. But the exhibition also gets a bit “dull” at times. “Monroe’s cheeriness, the glut of gleeful smiles, becomes overkill” – and you long to see some “slips of the mask”. Still, it’s clear that she had “a special, unselfconscious command of the camera”. I wanted to “hate” this show – exhibitions of celebrity photography are seldom interesting – yet, whether as a “mousy-haired” teenager or as an “uncontainable, insanely glamorous film star”, Monroe herself radiates charm. She makes it worthwhile.

    National Portrait Gallery, London WC2. Until 6 September

     
     
    ALBUM REVIEW

    Olivia Rodrigo: You Seem
    Pretty Sad for a Girl So in Love

    Olivia Rodrigo soared to world domination with “punky, pissed-off energy and wildly relatable, angst-filled anthems”, said Julyssa Lopez in Rolling Stone. Her third album finds her – initially – more giddily in love. “Drop Dead”, the opener and lead single, is a “pure dopamine rush” of heart-thudding percussion and euphoria. “Kiss me, and I might drop dead,” she sings. Of course, Rodrigo is too witty and self-aware to embrace fully a “googly-eyed lover-girl era”. On this album, her “most complete, musically adventurous” yet, she duly takes us through “the full arc of a relationship — the dreamy honeymoon phase, the first hints of conflict, the crushing goodbye”. Rodrigo is clearly a fan of The Cure, said Neil McCormick in The Telegraph. There are nods here to the British goth-rockers throughout, and Robert Smith guests on the “spikily addictive” duet “What’s Wrong With Me”. This is a witty, purposeful album from a “young star in full command of her powers. Love hurts, but perhaps another blockbusting number-one album can sweeten her suffering.”

     
     
    BOOK OF THE WEEK

    Stolen Revolution 

    by Bozorgmehr Sharafedin and Yeganeh Torbati

    When a coalition of “clerics, leftists, students, nationalists and secular intellectuals” launched the Iranian Revolution in 1979, they were united less by a shared vision than “a shared rejection” of the Shah’s rule, said Reza Aslan in The New York Times. And as Bozorgmehr Sharafedin and Yeganeh Torbati observe in “Stolen Revolution”, “egalitarian ideals and immense hopes” were snuffed out as “the religious regime hunted, expelled and jailed its former allies”.

    That is the story of this “quietly devastating” book, which charts Iran’s transformation over the past half century into a “mafia state”. The authors tell it through the lives of six Iranians, including a revolutionary ideologue, a tech entrepreneur, and two women at the forefront of the 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom protests.

    “The result is one of the most perceptive books on modern Iran in years, capturing not only the machinery of repression, but the fragile forms of hope that survive beneath it.”

    Once in power, Iran’s first supreme leader, Ruhollah Khomeini, swiftly “abandoned his revolutionary promises”, said Dina Nayeri in The Guardian. All talk of prosperity ended (our saints “gave up their lives for Islam, not for economics”, he intoned). Conservative dress codes were enforced, and a new military police force – the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps – was entrusted with preserving the revolution.

    While the presidency of Mohammad Khatami (1997-2005) marked a more liberal, “reformist era”, the hardliners regained control when he left office and have ruled the country ever since.

    “Stolen Revolution” is both an “unwavering account of the regime’s absurdities” and a “meticulously researched primer on modern Iran”.
    Parts of it will “move some readers to tears”, said Justin Marozzi in The Times. The authors describe the fates of Kosar Eftekhari and Rozhin Yousefzadeh, who joined the “protests that erupted after the death in custody of Mahsa Amini”, a young woman arrested for not wearing her hijab properly. “Eftekhari had her right eye shot out by a smirking plain-clothes officer”; Yousefzadeh was thrown into the “filthy and dangerous Qarchak women’s prison”.

    It was ostensibly in the hope of ending such tyranny that the US and Israel launched their war against the regime. This “blistering” book suggests that, on the contrary, the conflict will only entrench its most hardline elements further – and that it will prove to be “yet another US blunder in the Middle East, [and] one that will cost Iranians, and the rest of us, dearly”.

     
     
    OBITUARY

    David Hockney

    Titan of British art who never stopped seeing

    David Hockney, who has died aged 88, was widely considered to have been Britain’s greatest living artist, said The Telegraph: instantly recognisable, with his bleached-blond hair, round glasses, impish smile and “ever-smouldering cigarette”.

    What drove him was an intense need to understand “the way the world works, how the eye sees it and how the brush sets it down”, said Laura Freeman in The Times. He worked in oils, acrylics, watercolours, charcoal, pen and ink, pencil, felt-tips, crayons; he produced etchings and drypoints; and made use of Polaroid cameras, Xerox photocopiers, inkjet printers and the iPad. Hockney’s work was not always universally admired by the critics; but his aim, he said, had never been to please a room full of art-world insiders, but to make pictures that were appreciated by a lot of people. And he did. People flocked to his exhibitions; their posters became collectors’ items. In 2018, one of the sun-drenched paintings he produced in California – 1972’s “Portrait of an Artist (Pool with Two Figures)” – became the most expensive artwork by a living artist ever sold at auction, at $90 million (£67 million). 

    Yet neither his enormous success, nor the glamorous circles in which he moved – in Los Angeles, Paris and London – seemed fundamentally to change him. He retained a deep-seated seriousness about his work and a ferocious dedication to it.

    David Hockney was born in Bradford in 1937, the fourth of five children. His mother, Laura, was a devout Methodist and a vegetarian, while his father, Kenneth, an accounts clerk, had been a conscientious objector, and was a militant anti-smoker. From the age of three, Hockney drew where he could – even on the kitchen floor. Years later, he said that being gay in that era had not been as hard for him as it might have been, because he had always felt set apart by his talent. To his parents’ delight, he won a scholarship to Bradford Grammar School and at 16, he was awarded a grant to attend Bradford School of Art. On his first day, he turned up in a suit, bowler hat and red scarf, but while his dress sense was outlandish, his work ethic was even then decidedly Protestant, said Sam Woodhouse on BBC News: he was at his easel for 12 hours a day.

    He was taken on by the dealer John Kasmin, who oversaw his production of “A Rake’s Progress”, a series of etchings inspired by a visit to New York in 1961. He’d relished the energy of the city and its more permissive attitudes, and these semi-abstract etchings depicted the rake cruising in Central Park, dyeing his hair and drinking in gay bars. Kasmin marketed them at £250 a set. With the proceeds, Hockney flew back to New York in 1963, and then on to Los Angeles. 

    His first California picture was 1964’s “Plastic Tree Plus City Hall”, said The Guardian, which celebrated the flat artificiality of LA, what the critic Robert Hughes called its role as a “glaring, over-lit, antiseptic madhouse”. He followed it up with the pool paintings that remain among his most famous, including “Peter Getting Out of Nick’s Pool”, featuring the tan-lined bottom of Peter Schlesinger, his muse and lover, and 1967’s “A Bigger Splash”. In 1973 that work lent its name to a semi-fictionalised documentary about the artist. Shot over three years, it was focused on Hockney’s painful break-up from Schlesinger, his partner from 1966.

    The 1980s were a difficult period. As HIV-Aids ravaged LA’s gay community, Hockney saw countless friends and acquaintances fall sick and die. That his hearing was starting to deteriorate left him further isolated. Professionally, he moved away from painting and started to work on his “joiners” – hundreds of photographs that he stitched together to create images that encompassed multiple viewpoints. He called this new cubism. Having produced evocative set and costume designs for “The Rake’s Progress” at Glyndebourne in the mid-1970s, he embarked on major projects for the Metropolitan Opera in New York. More intimately, he painted and drew his beloved dachshunds, Stanley and Boodgie, over and over again. 

    Meanwhile, he had continued to paint his mother, on his many visits home. She died in 1999, aged 98. A few years later, he left LA and settled in the Edwardian villa overlooking the sea that he had bought for her, in Bridlington. From his studio nearby, he produced a series of monumental paintings of the Wolds landscape. These formed the basis of “A Bigger Picture” – a record-breaking exhibition at the Royal Academy in 2012. The following year tragedy struck when his 23-year-old studio assistant, Dominic Elliott, was found dead in his house after a drink and drugs bender. Hockney – who had been asleep at the time – was devastated. Soon after, he moved to Normandy with his partner of two decades, Jean-Pierre Gonçalves de Lima, where he captured the shifting landscape on an iPad. 

    Over the years, Hockney was offered countless honours and turned most down – including a knighthood. He did, however, accept the Order of Merit. It was a personal gift from the then-Queen, and he reasoned that it would be ungracious to reject it. Arguably, the honour he most appreciated came in 2007, said Sam Woodhouse. At a dinner at Tate Britain to mark his 70th birthday, it was announced that the smoke alarms would be turned off for 10 minutes at the end, so that Hockney could have a cigarette with his coffee.

     
     

    Image credits, from top: Amblin Entertainment / Universal Pictures / Album; André De Dienes / Muus Collection; Viking; Aurelien Meunier/Getty Images
     

    Recent editions

    • Saturday Wrap

      Who wants to be a trillionaire?

    • Evening Review

      Will the King in the North go south?

    • Morning Report

      Burnham wins decisively in by-election

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • FAQ
    Add as a preferred source on Google Add as a preferred source on Google

    The Week UK is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.