The suspected arson attack that razed Adolf Hitler’s mountaintop retreat has “reignited difficult questions” regarding the site’s future, said Smithsonian Magazine. The main dilemma German authorities face: to rebuild it or not?
The Kehlsteinhaus, known in English as the Eagle’s Nest, is perched 6,000 feet atop an Alpine peak. It was built in 1938 to host and impress visiting dignitaries. Unlike the vast majority of Nazi monuments, it survived the war and its aftermath and became a popular landmark and tourist spot.
The Eagle’s Nest was part of Obersalzberg, a Bavarian mountainside retreat that also included Hitler’s holiday home, the Berghof, which was mostly destroyed in the final months of World War II and later demolished. After the war, the Bavarian state government “wanted to raze Hitler’s favored hideaway” completely, said The Observer, but local officials “made the case to keep it going, at least in part.”
Debate is now raging about “whether and how to rebuild at the toxic site for the next generation of visitors while mitigating the never-quite-banished risk of creating a shrine for neo-Nazis,” said The Guardian. It’s a fraught issue, “particularly given the resurgence of the far right in Germany and in Europe more broadly.”
“For many, Germany has become a model for dealing with the legacies of dictatorship, war and genocide,” historian Gerald Steinacher, an expert on the Holocaust and Nazi Germany, said to The Christian Science Monitor. But as the questions over the Eagle’s Nest show, “how best to deal with Nazi buildings and sites remains an ongoing struggle.”
|