You may not have heard about the farm bill, a sprawling piece of legislation that subsidizes much of the food consumed in this country. But if Congress doesn't get its act together and renew the legislation by the end of this year, you could start feeling the effects at the supermarket in a major way come January.
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has been making the rounds to warn consumers that we are facing a dairy cliff if lawmakers don't act. Milk prices could double because of a rule that would revert the country back to a 1949 law that would force the government to buy milk products at roughly twice the going rate.
"So you, as a [milk] producer, would have a choice of selling it to your normal purchaser at $18 or $19 a hundred weight or to USDA at $38 a hundred weight," Vilsack explained to NPR. "What do you think producers will do?"
They're most likely going to pick the better deal for themselves, which will have a ripple effect throughout the food industry. Everything from butter to cheese to yogurt would be directly affected. Other products, like baked goods, that have milk-based ingredients will also see a rise in pricing. Dairy prices were already inching upwards because of record droughts over the summer.
If this all sounds familiar, that's because it is. Dairy farmers faced the same uncertainty at the end of 2012 only to see Congress kick the can down the road another year.
How did we get here? The farm bill covers everything from food stamps to crop insurance to energy development to forestry programs and soil conservation. Congress is supposed to renew it periodically, and both the House and Senate have produced bills that are approaching $1 trillion in spending spread out over the next several years. But as the end of the year nears, given the unprecedented level of gridlock, it's not clear that the two houses will be able to smooth out their differences.
The dairy pricing issue is supposed to act as a catalyst to force lawmakers from both parties to work together to pass the farm bill, which was typically renewed every four years. But as we've seen with the debt ceiling debates, Congress is willing to flirt with the idea of going off the fiscal cliff, so why should the dairy cliff be any different?
The main sticking point is food stamps, which account for 80 percent of the bill's total expenditures. House Republicans want to slash $39 billion over the next 10 years from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (their plan would make it harder to qualify for benefits) while Democrats in the Senate are only willing to cut $4 billion by making administrative changes. Any decrease would severely undermine the program's ability to deliver services to needy Americans. One in seven — about 47 million people — depend on SNAP to buy food.
Food stamps already took a hit in November when $5 billion in stimulus funding expired, leaving those depending on the program with about a five percent decrease in benefits. During the recession the number of people enrolled in SNAP increased dramatically, and just under half of those recipients are children.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Syrian women know how to defeat ISIS
- The U.S. Marines are developing laser weapons. Here's why.
- The one thing the New Atheists get right about religion
- 3 horrific inaccuracies in Homeland's depiction of Islamabad
- 10 things you need to know today: October 21, 2014
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Gamergate has backfired spectacularly on its nincompoop perpetrators
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why the Supreme Court is allowing Texas to hold an unconstitutional election
- Paul Krugman, Amazon, and the left's backwards view of book-industry titans
Subscribe to the Week