Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) trashed Russian President Vladimir Putin in an op-ed published Thursday on Pravda.ru, an online successor of the Soviet-era Kremlin mouthpiece. The Russian president, McCain wrote, coddles tyrants (including Syrian President Bashar al-Assad), jails dissidents, and rigs elections. "Russians deserve better than Putin."
Feel the chill? A few short years after President Obama set out to reboot Washington's faltering relations with Moscow, a Cold War mentality appears to be creeping back.
As recently as 2006, 73 percent of Americans saw Russia as an ally or friend. Just 20 percent considered it an adversary. Now, according to a new Gallup poll, more Americans see Russia as a foe than an ally (50 percent vs. 44 percent). That's the first time in a decade that the balance has tilted so anti-Russia.
Blame Putin, and his open clashes with President Obama, over everything from his sheltering of National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden to his protection of Assad. Putin's recent leadership on seizing Syria's chemical weapons may have won him some points with the U.S. public, says Matt Vasilogambros at National Journal, but a majority still have an unfavorable opinion of him.
President George W. Bush may have looked into Putin's eyes, saw his soul, and liked him, but the American people have looked into Putin's actions, saw his record, and didn't like what they saw. [National Journal]
In some ways, this does feel like the old Moscow-Washington rivalry. Yehuda Lukacs says at the Boston Herald that Putin is sponsoring fervently anti-U.S. regimes the Syria, Iran, and elsewhere in an attempt to reclaim the influence Moscow lost when the Soviet Union fell.
Putin, a former KGB officer during the old Cold War era, well versed in the game of realpolitik — the exercise of power politics — is determined to re-establish the old Soviet power in the Middle East and elsewhere. Obama, on the other hand, seems unable to respond to Putin's raw challenge. The president, however, must realize the new cold war is here to stay and the United States must change course and begin to stand up forcefully to Russia, which is contesting America's global leadership once again. [Boston Herald]
Russia indeed seems to be seizing every opportunity to tweak the U.S.. But does this really mean we're back to where we left off when the Soviet Union collapsed? "The answer is no," says Richard N. Haass at the Council on Foreign Relations. Putin's Times op-ed was just a "victory lap" after his proposal spared his ally, Assad, from a looming barrage of American missiles. The bottom line, though, is that Russia, unlike the Soviet Union, is no match for the U.S. militarily or economically, Haass says, so, "Putin will not want the competition to get out of hand."
While Putin can fairly claim to have won this round of diplomacy, through his own cleverness and Obama's multiple missteps, he cannot assume it is the harbinger of a trend, much less an era of global politics. Tactical triumphs cannot obscure or do away with the larger strategic reality of Russian limitations and weaknesses, and America's underlying power and reach. Ironically, it would take a very different Russia, one incompatible with Putin's authoritarianism, to be a 21st century power to be reckoned with. [Council on Foreign Relations]