Jobs data and GDP data, both released Wednesday, paint very different pictures of the U.S.'s economic recovery.

U.S. businesses added 200,000 jobs to the economy in July, the payroll processor ADP reported. The government's official jobs report won't be out for two more days, but the numbers are in step with recent trends: The economy created 195,000 new jobs in June, and 175,000 in May — good-but-not-great numbers that imply the economic recovery is proceeding at a slow, but steady pace.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) released its first estimate for the second quarter GDP growth. Based on GDP data, a measure of all the goods and services produced within a nation's borders, the recovery looks like it's struggling.

The BEA estimate put the annual growth pace in the second quarter at 1.7 percent. It also revised the first quarter GDP down to 1.1 percent, from its earlier estimate of 1.8 percent, indicating that the sequester — sweeping cuts to federal spending passed earlier this year — took a bigger bite out of growth than previously believed.

In all, the data showed the economy grew just 1.4 percent since the middle of last year — the slowest year-over-year pace since the recovery began three years ago.

Economist Justin Wolfers had this to say about the contrast:

So why the incongruity? "Some analysts say job growth is outpacing the sluggish economy because employers are making up for slow hiring early in the recovery," says USA Today.

However, investment banker Daniel Alpert had another idea, homing in on the fact that job growth has mainly occurred in low-wage sectors. Indeed, 75,000 of July's 200,000 jobs were in the leisure and hospitality industries, which typically pay low wages. Alpert wrote in Business Insider:

[T]he fact is that the U.S. employment situation is more of a wounded beast than a bull. And it is a wounded beast whose entrails tell a different story, indeed — one that ties far more convincingly into the anemic sub-2 percent GDP growth rate of the U.S. economy and the sluggish retail sales data we have seen of late. [Business Insider]

Furthermore, low-wage jobs may contribute to the cycle of sluggish growth. "[J]obs in the low-wage-paying sector offer the smallest bump up in economic activity not only because of their nominal wage levels," argued Alpert. "They also provide a correspondingly smaller net benefit to the economy in terms of the spread between the unemployment benefits being received by a formerly out of work individual and the compensation being received for working."