Why everyone’s talking about Gina Miller
The businesswoman is central to the Brexit legal challenges
The UK Supreme Court is examining a case brought by activist Gina Miller challenging the legality of Boris Johnson’s decision to prorogue Parliament in the run-up to the Brexit deadline.
The businesswoman has been at the forefront of the anti-Brexit from the beginning, first coming to prominence during a separate court challenge in 2016. Miller argued that then-prime minister Theresa May could not invoke Article 50 - starting the formal and legal process of leaving the EU - without the approval of a Commons majority, as The Telegraph reported at the time.
But just who is Miller, and what has she got to do with Brexit?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For more political analysis - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Get your first six issues free–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Who is Gina Miller?
Miller was born in Guyana but came to England at the age of ten to attend the exclusive Roedean School, on the outskirts of Brighton. She went on to study law at the University of East London (UEL) and has since started her own businesses and become an activist on a number of issues.
Before her involvement in Brexit legal challenges, Miller was best known for campaigning for transparency in investment and pension funds, says the BBC.
Her campaigning made her unpopular in certain circles, and some in the industry labelled her a “black widow spider”.
In a 2016 interview, she told the Financial Times: “Last summer I went along to an industry party and noticed three men staring at me. Being as bold as I am I went up to them, introduced myself and asked if there was a problem.
“One of them replied that I was a disgrace and that my lobbying efforts would bring down the entire City.”
She says she is neither a Brexiteer nor a Remainer, but campaigned for “remain, reform and review” during the referendum.
Miller is married for the third time and has three children.
Article 50 challenge
Backed by a crowd-funding campaign, Miller launched her first Brexit legal case in the aftermath of the EU referendum in June 2016.
She argued that the government could not invoke Article 50 without seeking approval from Parliament, but was adamant that the challenge was not an attempt to overturn the EU referendum decision, saying “we are all leavers now”.
Instead, she said, the case was about scrutinising the details of Brexit, such as “how we leave, how they’re going to negotiate, the directions of travel the government will take”.
“It is about any government, any prime minister, in the future being able to take away people’s rights without consulting Parliament,” she added.
“We cannot have a democracy like that. That isn’t a democracy, that is verging on dictatorship.”
Miller told the BBC that her role in the case had made her “apparently the most-hated woman in Britain”.
All the same, first the High Court and then the Supreme Court ruled in her favour.
Prorogation challenge
Miller is behind the ongoing legal challenge to the prime minister’s suspension of Parliament, currently being heard by the Supreme Court.
She says that if the Government wins the case, the courts would surrender their power to stop a PM from suspending Parliament for a year or longer, irrespective of their motives.
This would be incompatible with the rule of law and the basic principle that “the executive is answerable to Parliament and not vice versa”, says Miller’s written submission.
Johnson has said that he has the “greatest respect for the judiciary” and will “wait and see what the judges say” before deciding whether to recall Parliament.
What do her opponents say?
Leave campaigners insisted throughout the EU referendum campaign that the UK must uphold the core democratic value of Parliamentary sovereignty - meaning the UK Parliament holds power above all else, including the bloc.
But they are less than impressed with Miller’s current attempts to “defend Parliamentary sovereignty” and ensure Parliament is not “silenced”.
Indeed, Miller has received death and rape threats from Brexiteers who have branded her a “traitor”. In the same month as the Article 50 Supreme Court judgment, the Met police issued eight “cease and desist” notices to people who had sent Miller threatening messages, as the The Guardian reported.
Multiple men have been arrested for rape and racist threats towards her, and Rhodri Philipps, the fourth Viscount St Davids, was imprisoned for 12 weeks for offering money to anyone who would run over and kill Miller.
“I have to remind myself that it’s a good day when I don’t get a threat,” Miller told LBC radio earlier this year. “When somebody doesn’t threaten to kill my children, behead me, rape me.”
She left the Supreme Court on Tuesday to Brexiteer shouts of “traitor”, “shyster” and “Brexit now”.
What do her fans say?
Although Miller’s enemies are generally more vocal than her supporters, she has been praised by a number of high-profile figures.
Labour MP David Lammy this week tweeted: “Gina Miller stands for openness, democracy and the rule of law. She represents the best of British and is far more of a patriot than those who call her a ‘traitor’.”
And political commentator Ian Dunt says her name has become synonymous with “constitutional principle”.
.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Shardlake: a 'tightly plotted, gorgeously atmospheric piece of television'
The Week Recommends Arthur Hughes captivates in this 'eminently watchable' Tudor murder mystery
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
Major League Baseball is facing an epidemic of pitcher's injuries
Under the Radar Many insiders are blaming the pitch clock for the rise in injuries — but the league is not so sure
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
8 movie musicals that prove the screen can share the stage
The Week Recommends The singing and dancing, bigger than life itself
By Scott Hocker, The Week US Published
-
'Presidential debates are more performance art than actual ways to inform'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
'Horror stories of women having to carry nonviable fetuses'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
'Elevating Earth Day into a national holiday is not radical — it's practical'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Is the Supreme Court about to criminalize homelessness?
Talking Points The court will decide if bans on outdoor camping are 'cruel and unusual'
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
In what states is abortion legal, illegal, and in limbo?
In The Spotlight Where American states stand on abortion care
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
How could the Supreme Court's Fischer v. US case impact the other Jan 6. trials including Trump's?
Today's Big Question A former Pennsylvania cop might hold the key to a major upheaval in how the courts treat the Capitol riot — and its alleged instigator
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
'Young kids simply shouldn't be on social media'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
'A great culture will be lost if the EV brigade gets its way'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published