Reaction: Democrats reveal Trump impeachment articles
Are the charges the end of the road or a possible boost for the US president?

Donald Trump has dismissed as “ridiculous” the articles of impeachment levelled against him by the House Democrats.
The US president described the two articles, which accuse him of abuse of power and obstructing Congress, as a “fraud”.
Announcing the abuse of power article, Jerry Nadler, House judiciary chairman, said: “It is an impeachable offence for the president to exercise the powers of his public office to obtain an improper personal benefit while ignoring or injuring the national interest.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“That is exactly what President Trump did when he solicited and pressured Ukraine to interfere in our 2020 presidential election, thus damaging our national security, undermining the integrity of the next election, and violating his oath to the American people.”
On the obstruction of Congress, Nadler said: “A president who places himself above accountability, above the American people and above Congress’s power of impeachment… is a president who sees himself as above the law. We must be clear no one not even the president is above the law.”
If the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee votes to approve the articles, they will then be sent to the lower chamber for a full vote.
If the articles are approved by the House, an impeachment trial in the Republican-held Senate will take place, possibly within a matter of weeks.
Although this is a development that was anticipated and that Democrats have been building towards for some time, it is highly significant. CNN says the news sees Trump reach “the point of no return”.
The BBC’s North America editor, Jon Sopel, wrote that the announcement: “made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up”. He added: “For all the sound and fury of today's politics, this is not an everyday occurrence.”
How damaging it is to Trump’s 2020 White House campaign remains to be seen but some believe that it could actually help him.
An article for CNBC says the impeachment articles play into Trump’s hands. Jake Novak writes that for a “man whose brief political career has been entirely about a virulent campaign against the political establishment, fighting a battle against a series of entrenched politicians fits right into his brand”.
It took the man himself nearly an hour to respond and he did so on Twitter. “Nadler just said that I ‘pressured Ukraine to interfere in our 2020 Election,’” wrote Trump. “Ridiculous, and he knows that is not true. Both the President & Foreign Minister of Ukraine said, many times, that there ‘WAS NO PRESSURE.’ Nadler and the Dems know this, but refuse to acknowledge!”
He then sent a tweet attacking House intelligence committee chair Adam Schiff, who wrote: “Shifty Schiff, a totally corrupt politician, made up a horrible and fraudulent statement, read it to Congress, and said those words came from me. He got caught, was very embarrassed, yet nothing happened to him for committing this fraud. He’ll eventually have to answer for this!”
The impeachment process was sparked when an anonymous whistleblower complained to Congress in September about a July phone call by Trump to the president of Ukraine.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial subscription today –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Does depopulation threaten humanity?
Talking Points Falling birth rates could create a 'smaller, sadder, poorer future'
-
New White House guidance means federal employees could be hearing more religious talk at work
The Explainer Employees can now try to persuade co-workers of why their religion is 'correct'
-
Real-life couples creating real-deal sparks in the best movies to star IRL partners
The Week Recommends The chemistry between off-screen items can work wonders
-
Trump contradicts Israel, says 'starvation' in Gaza
Speed Read The president suggests Israel could be doing more to alleviate the suffering of Palestinians
-
The Pentagon's missing missiles
Feature The U.S. military is low on weapons. Can it restock before a major conflict breaks out?
-
Rescissions: Trump's push to control federal spending
Feature The GOP passed a bill to reduce funding for PBS, NPR and other public media stations
-
Knives come out for Pam Bondi
IN THE SPOTLIGHT She wasn't Trump's first pick to lead the Justice Department. After months of scandals and setbacks, is the attorney general's MAGA shelf life winding down?
-
Can Gaza aid drops work?
Today's Big Question UN's Palestinian refugee agency calls plan a 'distraction and smokescreen' as pressure mounts on Israel to agree ceasefire and fully open land crossings
-
'Spending is what card issuers are hoping you will do'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump executive order targets homeless
Speed Read It will now be easier for states and cities to remove homeless people from the streets
-
Florida judge and DOJ make Epstein trouble for Trump
Speed Read The Trump administration's request to release grand jury transcripts from the Epstein investigation was denied