At least 20 former Jehovah’s Witnesses are suing the religious group over alleged historical sexual abuse.
The BBC reports that the religious organisation “has a policy of not punishing alleged child sex abuse unless a second person, alongside the accuser, has witnessed it - or an abuser confesses”.
However, a former elder has disputed the group’s claims that senior figures always tell police if a child is in danger “even if there is only one witness”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
John Viney, who alleges that he was abused between the ages of nine and 13 by “an active Jehovah’s Witness”, claims children are still being abused.
He told the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire programme: “The way that Jehovah’s Witnesses handle matters within the congregation, it’s a closed shop.
“I know for a fact now that there are parents that haven't done anything about the abuse of their children by others because they don't want to bring reproach on Jehovah’s name.”
A Jehovah’s Witnesses spokesperson said in a statement: “The only way that a child abuser can gain access to children in a religious organisation like ours, which does not have any programmes that separate children from their parents, is through parents themselves.”
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Start your trial subscription today –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
But, the Daily Mail reports, a High Court judge has raised concerns after hearing that ministers in a congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses waited more than two and a half years before telling police that a girl had made sexual abuse allegations against her father.
The judge said the evidence pointed to the fact that elders knew about the allegations in December 2016, when the girl was nine, but had not reported the issue to police until July 2019, the paper adds.
A separate case was resolved in January this year, when leaders of the Jehovah’s Witnesses were told to pay £62,000 in damages to a former member who was raped after attending door-to-door visits 30 years ago.
Although a “judicial committee” of the group’s elders found the allegations against Mark Sewell to be “not proven” in an internal inquiry in 1991, a High Court judge ruled in her favour last month.
In 2018, an independent inquiry into child sexual abuse said there had been “a considerable number” of complaints against the religious group.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.