What is the Fixed-term Parliaments Act?
Queen’s Speech says the new Government will attempt to repeal the act

Boris Johnson’s Conservative government plans to abolish the Fixed-term Parliaments Act according to the Queen’s Speech, removing the restrictions on when elections can be held.
The repeal of the act was included in the Conservative Party’s manifesto at the general election.
The Queen said: “A Constitution, Democracy and Rights Commission will be established. Work will be taken forward to repeal the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The act, which set the timeline for general elections, was introduced in 2011 by David Cameron’s Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition government.
According to political scientist Colin Talbot, the act makes minority governments more stable than in the past, but professor of constitutional law Robert Blackburn QC has said that “the status and effect of a no confidence motion remains largely as it was prior to the Act”, meaning little changed.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For more political analysis - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Get your first six issues free–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
What is the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011?
Simply put, it is the legislation that introduced fixed-term elections to Westminster for the first time, creating a five-year period between general elections.
The only circumstances in which elections may be called prematurely are if either the Commons passes a motion in which the “number of members who vote in favour” of dissolving parliament is “greater than two-thirds of the number of seats in the House”, or MPs back a vote of no confidence in the sitting government and 14 days elapse without any administration gaining – or regaining – that confidence.
Why was it introduced?
The coalition government introduced the legislation in 2011 to “underpin its stability by making it hard for either party to bring the government down and force another election”, says The Independent’s John Rentoul.
But it was also enacted in order to stop “opportunist prime ministers ever again calling snap elections to capitalise on hefty poll leads”, writes James Morrison of the Oxford University Press. Ironically, he adds, “it has proved itself wholly incapable of doing any such thing”.
Despite the stated aims of the act, a prime minister wishing to call a general election could, as Boris Johnson is repeatedly attempting to do with Jeremy Corbyn, dare their opposite number to refuse a general election – something widely believed to be electoral suicide.
For this reason, “as an exercise in constitutional tinkering, the check and balance of fixed parliamentary terms has failed”, wrote the Financial Times ahead of the 2017 general election.
Why do the Conservatives want to abolish it?
The law frustrated three attempts by Johnson to call an election on his own terms as it requires two-thirds of MPs to vote for a poll.
The Tory manifesto pledged to “get rid” of the act as it has “led to paralysis at a time the country needed decisive action”. Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour manifesto also said it would abolish the law as it “stifled democracy and propped up weak governments”.
According to HuffPost: “Critics of the FTPA when it was introduced said it was a one-off fix to ensure [David Cameron’s] coalition did not collapse.”
If the act is abolished, Johnson will have the power to call an election whenever he chooses.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How will the new tax deductions on auto loans work?
the explainer Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act introduced a tax deduction on auto loan interest — but eligibility for the tax break is limited
-
Is Trump actually going to prosecute Obama for 'treason'?
Today's Big Question Or is this just a distraction from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal?
-
5 best movie sequels of all time
The Week Recommends The second time is only sometimes as good as the first
-
What difference will the 'historic' UK-Germany treaty make?
Today's Big Question Europe's two biggest economies sign first treaty since WWII, underscoring 'triangle alliance' with France amid growing Russian threat and US distance
-
Corbynism returns: a new party on the Left
Talking Point Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana's breakaway progressive party has already got off to a shaky start
-
Entente cordiale: will state visit help UK-French relations get over Brexit?
Today's Big Question The King, a keen Francophile who has a warm relationship with Emmanuel Macron, will play a key role in state visit
-
Is the G7 still relevant?
Talking Point Donald Trump's early departure cast a shadow over this week's meeting of the world's major democracies
-
Angela Rayner: Labour's next leader?
Today's Big Question A leaked memo has sparked speculation that the deputy PM is positioning herself as the left-of-centre alternative to Keir Starmer
-
Brexit 'reset' deal: how will it work?
In Depth Keir Stamer says the deal is a 'win-win', but he faces claims that he has 'surrendered' to Brussels on fishing rights
-
Are we entering the post-Brexit era?
Today's Big Question Keir Starmer's 'big bet' with his EU reset deal is that 'nobody really cares' about Brexit any more
-
Is Starmer's plan to send migrants overseas Rwanda 2.0?
Today's Big Question Failed asylum seekers could be removed to Balkan nations under new government plans