What is the Fixed-term Parliaments Act?
Queen’s Speech says the new Government will attempt to repeal the act
Boris Johnson’s Conservative government plans to abolish the Fixed-term Parliaments Act according to the Queen’s Speech, removing the restrictions on when elections can be held.
The repeal of the act was included in the Conservative Party’s manifesto at the general election.
The Queen said: “A Constitution, Democracy and Rights Commission will be established. Work will be taken forward to repeal the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The act, which set the timeline for general elections, was introduced in 2011 by David Cameron’s Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition government.
According to political scientist Colin Talbot, the act makes minority governments more stable than in the past, but professor of constitutional law Robert Blackburn QC has said that “the status and effect of a no confidence motion remains largely as it was prior to the Act”, meaning little changed.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For more political analysis - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Get your first six issues free–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
What is the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011?
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Simply put, it is the legislation that introduced fixed-term elections to Westminster for the first time, creating a five-year period between general elections.
The only circumstances in which elections may be called prematurely are if either the Commons passes a motion in which the “number of members who vote in favour” of dissolving parliament is “greater than two-thirds of the number of seats in the House”, or MPs back a vote of no confidence in the sitting government and 14 days elapse without any administration gaining – or regaining – that confidence.
Why was it introduced?
The coalition government introduced the legislation in 2011 to “underpin its stability by making it hard for either party to bring the government down and force another election”, says The Independent’s John Rentoul.
But it was also enacted in order to stop “opportunist prime ministers ever again calling snap elections to capitalise on hefty poll leads”, writes James Morrison of the Oxford University Press. Ironically, he adds, “it has proved itself wholly incapable of doing any such thing”.
Despite the stated aims of the act, a prime minister wishing to call a general election could, as Boris Johnson is repeatedly attempting to do with Jeremy Corbyn, dare their opposite number to refuse a general election – something widely believed to be electoral suicide.
For this reason, “as an exercise in constitutional tinkering, the check and balance of fixed parliamentary terms has failed”, wrote the Financial Times ahead of the 2017 general election.
Why do the Conservatives want to abolish it?
The law frustrated three attempts by Johnson to call an election on his own terms as it requires two-thirds of MPs to vote for a poll.
The Tory manifesto pledged to “get rid” of the act as it has “led to paralysis at a time the country needed decisive action”. Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour manifesto also said it would abolish the law as it “stifled democracy and propped up weak governments”.
According to HuffPost: “Critics of the FTPA when it was introduced said it was a one-off fix to ensure [David Cameron’s] coalition did not collapse.”
If the act is abolished, Johnson will have the power to call an election whenever he chooses.
-
‘Mexico: A 500-Year History’ by Paul Gillingham and ‘When Caesar Was King: How Sid Caesar Reinvented American Comedy’ by David Margolickfeature A chronicle of Mexico’s shifts in power and how Sid Caesar shaped the early days of television
-
GOP wins tight House race in red Tennessee districtSpeed Read Republicans maintained their advantage in the House
-
Are the U.S. boat strikes a war crime?Today’s Big Question Hegseth is defiant after Venezuela reports
-
Is a Reform-Tory pact becoming more likely?Today’s Big Question Nigel Farage’s party is ahead in the polls but still falls well short of a Commons majority, while Conservatives are still losing MPs to Reform
-
The launch of Your Party: how it could workThe Explainer Despite landmark decisions made over the party’s makeup at their first conference, core frustrations are ‘likely to only intensify in the near-future’
-
Asylum hotels: everything you need to knowThe Explainer Using hotels to house asylum seekers has proved extremely unpopular. Why, and what can the government do about it?
-
Taking the low road: why the SNP is still standing strongTalking Point Party is on track for a fifth consecutive victory in May’s Holyrood election, despite controversies and plummeting support
-
Your Party: a Pythonesque shamblesTalking Point Comical disagreements within Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana's group highlight their precarious position
-
Is Britain turning into ‘Trump’s America’?Today’s Big Question Direction of UK politics reflects influence and funding from across the pond
-
Behind the ‘Boriswave’: Farage plans to scrap indefinite leave to remainThe Explainer The problem of the post-Brexit immigration surge – and Reform’s radical solution
-
Who will win the battle for the soul of the Green Party?An ideological divide is taking root among the environmentalists