Donald Trump's new communications director has ignited fresh conflict among senior White House officials after giving a profanity-laden interview.
Anthony Scaramucci told New Yorker journalist Ryan Lizza that chief of staff Reince Priebus was a "f***ing paranoid schizophrenic" and said he was not like White House chief strategist Steve Bannon because "I'm not trying to suck my own c**k".
Lizza said Scaramucci, who refers to himself as "The Mooch", called him wanting to know who had leaked the news that the communications director was having dinner with the President in the White House.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
He then accused Priebus of being the source and suggested the chief of staff, along with several other senior staff members, would be forced to resign.
"What I'm going to do is, I will eliminate everyone in the comms team and we'll start over," Scaramucci said. "They'll all be fired by me.
"I fired one guy the other day. I have three to four people I'll fire tomorrow. I'll get to the person who leaked that to you. Reince Priebus – if you want to leak something – he'll be asked to resign very shortly."
Scaramucci "has reportedly long blamed Priebus for keeping him out of the White House when Trump took office in January, despite his loyalty to the Trump campaign", The Guardian says.
The public rift leaves the White House with limited options. Firing Scaramucci so early in his tenure "would be tacit admission the President made a mistake in hiring him", writes Anthony Zurcher for the BBC. "The I-told-you-so's from the Priebus crowd would be deafening."
Nevertheless, he adds, the idea that Scaramucci "could find some unrelated excuse to bow out - business concerns, perhaps… doesn't seem the pugnacious New Yorker's style".
-
Exploring ancient forests on three continentsThe Week Recommends Reconnecting with historic nature across the world
-
How oil tankers have been weaponisedThe Explainer The seizure of a Russian tanker in the Atlantic last week has drawn attention to the country’s clandestine shipping network
-
The rise of the spymaster: a ‘tectonic shift’ in Ukraine’s politicsIn the Spotlight President Zelenskyy’s new chief of staff, former head of military intelligence Kyrylo Budanov, is widely viewed as a potential successor
-
Trump threatens Minnesota with Insurrection ActSpeed Read The law was passed in 1807 but has rarely been used
-
The high street: Britain’s next political battleground?In the Spotlight Mass closure of shops and influx of organised crime are fuelling voter anger, and offer an opening for Reform UK
-
Why is Trump threatening defense firms?Talking Points CEO pay and stock buybacks will be restricted
-
‘The security implications are harder still to dismiss’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Judge clears wind farm construction to resumeSpeed Read The Trump administration had ordered the farm shuttered in December over national security issues
-
Trump DOJ targets Fed’s Powell, drawing pushbackSpeed Read Powell called the investigation ‘unprecedented’
-
What are Donald Trump’s options in Iran?Today's Big Question Military strikes? Regime overthrow? Cyberattacks? Sanctions? How can the US help Iranian protesters?
-
Maduro’s capture: two hours that shook the worldTalking Point Evoking memories of the US assault on Panama in 1989, the manoeuvre is being described as the fastest regime change in history
