A terminally ill man with motor neurone disease lost his London court case today challenging the 1961 Suicide Act - fuelling debate about whether dying people have a right to end their lives with medical help.
Noel Conway, 67, wanted his doctor to prescribe a lethal dose in order to have what he described as a “peaceful and dignified” death.
His lawyers argued that UK law is incompatible with European legislation that guarantees the right to respect for private and family life, and protection from discrimination, says the BBC website. But the Secretary of State for Justice’s lawyer, James Strachan, argued that it was inappropriate for the courts to interfere with Parliament’s decision on the “sensitive moral, social and ethical issue” raised, the London Evening Standard says.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Conway, from Shrewsbury, Shropshire, vowed to appeal.
“The experiences of those who are terminally ill need to be heard. This decision denies me a real say over how and when I will die,” Conway said, according to The Guardian.
Sarah Wootton, chief executive of Dignity in Dying, told The Guardian that the case was a paradox: “How can it be more ethical or safe for Noel to have his ventilation withdrawn under the current law, with no formal safeguards, than for him to request life-ending medication within the multiple safeguards proposed through his case?”
The British Medical Association has opposed physician-assisted dying, saying it risked putting “vulnerable people at risk of harm” and breached medical ethics.
Under UK law, anyone who helps Conway would be committing a criminal offence, The Independent says.
-
'With every technological advance, there are risks'Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
5 of the best platonic TV friendshipsthe week recommends Maintaining boundaries has proven tricky for all but the most committed of buddies on the small screen
-
Why are global postal services cutting off package delivery to the US?Today's Big Question 'Uncertainty' around new tariff rules halts small-dollar imports
-
Home Office worker accused of spiking mistress’s drink with abortion drugSpeed Read Darren Burke had failed to convince his girlfriend to terminate pregnancy
-
In hock to Moscow: exploring Germany’s woeful energy policySpeed Read Don’t expect Berlin to wean itself off Russian gas any time soon
-
Were Covid restrictions dropped too soon?Speed Read ‘Living with Covid’ is already proving problematic – just look at the travel chaos this week
-
Inclusive Britain: a new strategy for tackling racism in the UKSpeed Read Government has revealed action plan setting out 74 steps that ministers will take
-
Sandy Hook families vs. Remington: a small victory over the gunmakersSpeed Read Last week the families settled a lawsuit for $73m against the manufacturer
-
Farmers vs. walkers: the battle over ‘Britain’s green and pleasant land’Speed Read Updated Countryside Code tells farmers: ‘be nice, say hello, share the space’
-
Motherhood: why are we putting it off?Speed Read Stats show around 50% of women in England and Wales now don’t have children by 30
-
Anti-Semitism in America: a case of double standards?Speed Read Officials were strikingly reluctant to link Texas synagogue attack to anti-Semitism
