Why ‘edge sorting’ is illegal in casinos
US poker star Phil Ivey loses millions as UK judges rule that he cheated
US poker star Phil Ivey has lost his UK Supreme Court bid to claim £7.7m that he won using a technique known as “edge sorting” at a London casino.
The former World Series of Poker champion tried to claim the cash following a private game of punto banco - a form of baccarat - at the Crockfords Club casino in Mayfair in 2012, according to the BBC News website.
But Crockfords accused the 40-year-old and his gambling partner, Cheung Yin Sun, of cheating by using edge sorting, and refused to pay up. On Wednesday, the UK Supreme Court ruled in favour of the casino.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But what is edge sorting? And why is it cheating?
The technique
Edge sorting is possible when cards are unintentionally manufactured with tiny differences on their edges - for example, when the edge of one long side is marginally different from the edge of the other.
Players look for subtle differences in the pattern on the back of the playing cards to work out whether a face-down playing card is high or low. They then try to convince the dealers to sort the cards into high and low values, thereby increasing their chance of winning, Metro says.
If a player can convince the dealer to sort the deck so that high-value cards are facing one way and low-value cards face the other way, they know which kind of card will be dealt next.
Although Ivey did not personally touch any cards at the table, he persuaded the croupier to rotate the most valuable cards by claiming he was superstitious, reports the London Evening Standard.
Why is that cheating?
Ivey argued that he won legitimately and that the casino casino had failed to take proper steps to protect itself from a player of his ability. However, the judges ruled that what Ivey did amounted to deception.
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Hughes said the key point was that Ivey “did not just watch the cards with a trained eye but rather he took active steps to fix the shoe [deck]”.
Supreme Court Judge Anthony Hughes said the integrity of punto banco baccarat depends on cards being dealt at random, without gamblers knowing their face value, says the Associated Press.
"What Mr Ivey did was to stage a carefully planned and executed sting," Hughes said.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Today's political cartoons - November 23, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - qualifications, tax cuts, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Long summer days in Iceland's highlands
The Week Recommends While many parts of this volcanic island are barren, there is a 'desolate beauty' to be found in every corner
By The Week UK Published
-
The Democrats: time for wholesale reform?
Talking Point In the 'wreckage' of the election, the party must decide how to rebuild
By The Week UK Published
-
Texas’s abortion law: the Republicans get their way, at last
Speed Read SB8 authorises private citizens to sue anyone who performs, ‘aids or abets’ an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy
By The Week Staff Published
-
Changing legal gender: what’s new and how does it work?
Speed Read Cost of a gender recognition certificate application is reduced from £140 to £5
By Kate Samuelson Last updated
-
America’s bloodiest state votes to ban the death penalty
Speed Read Virginia has executed more than 1,300 people in its 400-year history
By Joe Evans Last updated
-
FBI accused of ‘fake’ background check on Donald Trump Supreme Court nominee
Speed Read Democratic senator calls for ‘proper oversight’ over Brett Kavanaugh investigation into sexual assault claims
By Joe Evans Last updated
-
Family of Malcolm X claims letter proves FBI and NYPD involved in his murder
Speed Read Daughters of assassinated civil rights leader demand reopening of investigation
By Joe Evans Last updated
-
Meghan Markle granted nine-month delay in Mail on Sunday privacy case
Speed Read Duchess of Sussex had applied for summary judgement in battle over letters sent to her estranged father
By Chas Newkey-Burden Last updated
-
Meghan Markle to pay £67,000 after losing first round of legal battle against Mail
Speed Read Duchess of Sussex is suing the newspaper’s publisher for printing parts of private letter to her father
By Joe Evans Published
-
MI6 agents tried to stop judge seeing secret documents in ‘licence to kill’ case
Speed Read Intelligence agency was forced to apologise for ‘any misunderstanding’, court documents show
By Joe Evans Published