US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief Scott Pruitt has resigned, amid more than a dozen separate investigations over spending, ethics and management.
In a resignation letter released by the EPA, Pruitt said he was stepping down because of “unrelenting attacks on me personally, [and] my family”, which are “unprecedented and have taken a sizable toll on all of us.”
However, the Washington Post reports that Pruitt was told by the White House that he “had to submit his resignation”, and that Trump did not speak with Pruitt personally.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Trump later told reporters that the decision to resign had been Pruitt’s, and that there was “no final straw” that led to the decision.
“He came to me and said, ‘I have such great confidence in the administration. I don’t want to be a distraction,’” Trump said. “And I think Scott felt that he was a distraction.”
CNN says “an ethics cloud hung over Pruitt for months”, with lawmakers from both parties raising questions about his spending, housing arrangements, personal security detail and large pay rises for political appointees.
Pruitt was being investigated over his rental of a furnished room in a townhouse close to the US Capitol for $50 a night. The building is owned by the wife of an energy industry lobbyist.
The former EPA chief was also under investigation for lavish spending on office improvements, including “$5,800 on thumb-print security locks, $1,560 for 12 fountain pens and $43,000 for a soundproof phone booth”, the BBC says.
Senator Thomas Carper, the top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, hailed Pruitt’s departure, saying: “He’s done a lot of damage. It can be reversed, but it’s going to take some time.”
-
‘No one is exempt from responsibility, and especially not elite sport circuits’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Businesses are caught in the middle of ICE activitiesIn the Spotlight Many companies are being forced to choose a side in the ICE debate
-
Leadership: A conspicuous silence from CEOsFeature CEOs were more vocal during Trump’s first term
-
Israel retrieves final hostage’s body from GazaSpeed Read The 24-year-old police officer was killed during the initial Hamas attack
-
China’s Xi targets top general in growing purgeSpeed Read Zhang Youxia is being investigated over ‘grave violations’ of the law
-
Panama and Canada are negotiating over a crucial copper mineIn the Spotlight Panama is set to make a final decision on the mine this summer
-
Why Greenland’s natural resources are nearly impossible to mineThe Explainer The country’s natural landscape makes the task extremely difficult
-
Iran cuts internet as protests escalateSpeed Reada Government buildings across the country have been set on fire
-
US nabs ‘shadow’ tanker claimed by RussiaSpeed Read The ship was one of two vessels seized by the US military
-
How Bulgaria’s government fell amid mass protestsThe Explainer The country’s prime minister resigned as part of the fallout
-
Femicide: Italy’s newest crimeThe Explainer Landmark law to criminalise murder of a woman as an ‘act of hatred’ or ‘subjugation’ but critics say Italy is still deeply patriarchal
