Donald Trump has revoked the security clearance of a former director of the CIA, in an unusual move that appears to be politically motivated.
The White House announced yesterday that former CIA director John Brennan’s security clearance would be pulled, which CNN says is an “unprecedented use of a president’s authority over the classification system to strike back at one of his prominent critics”.
Why has Brennan’s security clearance been revoked?
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
CNBC has described the withdrawal of Brennan’s security credentials as “more of a political than practical move”.
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders, reading from a statement by Trump, said: “Mr Brennan’s lying and recent conduct characterised by increasingly frenzied commentary is wholly inconsistent with access to the nation's most closely held secrets.”
How did Brennan react?
Brennan responded to the announcement on Twitter, saying: “This action is part of a broader effort by Mr. Trump to suppress freedom of speech & punish critics. It should gravely worry all Americans… My principles are worth far more than clearances. I will not relent.”
Who could be next?
Trump foreshadowed his latest move at the end of July, when he announced he was exploring the option of revoking security clearances for a number of former intelligence officials, including Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey and former Director of the National Security Agency Michael Hayden, among others.
Time reports that former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said that while Trump “has the authority to revoke the clearances”, doing so in response to criticism would be “a very, very petty thing to do” and an “abuse of the system.”
According to CNN, “Singling out dissenting former public servants in this way is a norm-busting power play that might seem tame in political systems ruled with an iron grip by Russia's Vladimir Putin and China's Xi Jinping, who Trump admires. But it would be fueled by a strongman's instinct that both those leaders might recognise.”
-
The environmental cost of GLP-1sThe explainer Producing the drugs is a dirty process
-
Greenland’s capital becomes ground zero for the country’s diplomatic straitsIN THE SPOTLIGHT A flurry of new consular activity in Nuuk shows how important Greenland has become to Europeans’ anxiety about American imperialism
-
‘This is something that happens all too often’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
House votes to end Trump’s Canada tariffsSpeed Read Six Republicans joined with Democrats to repeal the president’s tariffs
-
Bondi, Democrats clash over Epstein in hearingSpeed Read Attorney General Pam Bondi ignored survivors of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and demanded that Democrats apologize to Trump
-
How corrupt is the UK?The Explainer Decline in standards ‘risks becoming a defining feature of our political culture’ as Britain falls to lowest ever score on global index
-
US to send 200 troops to Nigeria to train armySpeed Read Trump has accused the West African government of failing to protect Christians from terrorist attacks
-
Grand jury rejects charging 6 Democrats for ‘orders’ videoSpeed Read The jury refused to indict Democratic lawmakers for a video in which they urged military members to resist illegal orders
-
Trump links funding to name on Penn StationSpeed Read Trump “can restart the funding with a snap of his fingers,” a Schumer insider said
-
Trump reclassifies 50,000 federal jobs to ease firingsSpeed Read The rule strips longstanding job protections from federal workers
-
Is the Gaza peace plan destined to fail?Today’s Big Question Since the ceasefire agreement in October, the situation in Gaza is still ‘precarious’, with the path to peace facing ‘many obstacles’
