The Bank of England has issued a warning that thousands of jobs may be at risk of being replaced by artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
Andy Haldane, the bank’s chief economist, told the BBC that the rapid growth of AI development would make many jobs “obsolete”. It could also spawn a “Fourth Industrial Revolution” that would be on a “far greater scale” than the first one of the Victorian era.
Appearing on BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme this morning, Haldane said: “Each of those [industrial revolutions] had a wrenching and lengthy impact on the jobs market, on the lives and livelihoods of large swathes of society”.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
He said that the next Industrial Revolution could feature AI-powered machines capable of “thinking and doing”. These would replace “both the cognitive and the technical skills of humans.”
Haldane’s comments reflect the predictions of several tech experts, the Huffington Post says. The most common belief is that AI will have the most significant impact on manual jobs, while occupations involving more human interaction may be the least affected.
But not everyone agrees. Leslie Willcocks, a professor at the London School of Economics, told the news site that the move to greater automation in the workplace could be beneficial for employees.
He said that companies that use AI for “monotonous” roles could then place workers in “more interesting” and “rewarding” positions.
Meanwhile, a study by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) earlier this year claimed that fears over AI replacing thousands of jobs were “overblown”, the Financial Times reports.
The OECD argues that occupations are significantly harder to automate than previous studies have predicted, the FT adds.
In either situation, Haldane suggests the best course of action is for employers to create more roles that cannot be fulfilled by AI.
He concluded: “We will need even greater numbers of new jobs to be created in the future, if we are not to suffer this longer-term feature called technological unemployment”.
-
Supreme Court to decide on mail-in ballot limitsSpeed Read The court will determine whether states can count mail-in ballots received after Election Day
-
Democrats split as Senate votes to end shutdownSpeed Read The proposed deal does not extend Affordable Care Act subsidies, the Democrats’ main demand
-
Political cartoons for November 11Cartoons Tuesday's political cartoons include GOP promises, a pardoned turkey, and stumping for Cop30
-
Is AI to blame for recent job cuts?Today’s Big Question Numerous companies have called out AI for being the reason for the culling
-
‘Deskilling’: a dangerous side effect of AI useThe explainer Workers are increasingly reliant on the new technology
-
AI models may be developing a ‘survival drive’Under the radar Chatbots are refusing to shut down
-
Saudi Arabia could become an AI focal pointUnder the Radar A state-backed AI project hopes to rival China and the United States
-
AI is making houses more expensiveUnder the radar Homebuying is also made trickier by AI-generated internet listings
-
‘How can I know these words originated in their heart and not some data center in northern Virginia?’instant opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
AI: is the bubble about to burst?In the Spotlight Stock market ever-more reliant on tech stocks whose value relies on assumptions of continued growth and easy financing
-
Your therapist, the chatbotFeature Americans are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence for mental health support. Is that sensible?
