Can Trump end birthright citizenship?
The President wants to scrap automatic citizenship for babies born on US soil
President Donald Trump has again suggested his administration is working towards ending birthright citizenship, a constitutional right that grants citizenship to all children born in the US, regardless of their parents’ nationality.
Speaking to White House reporters on Wednesday, Trump said: “We’re looking at birthright citizenship very seriously.”
“Birthright citizenship, where you have a baby on our land – walk over the border, have a baby, congratulations, the baby’s now a US citizen… it’s frankly ridiculous.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
However, many prominent politicians – including Republicans – are adamant that the President does not have the power to abolish the right, says The Independent.
Trump first brought up the idea of scrapping birthright citizenship during his 2016 presidential campaign, branding it “a magnet for illegal immigration”, reports Time.
He suggested it again ahead of 2018 US midterms. “We’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States for 85 years,” the president claimed, incorrectly, in a TV interview with Axios in October. “It’s ridiculous. It’s ridiculous. And it has to end.”
What is birthright citizenship?
Birthright citizenship is a constitutional right that automatically grants citizenship to children born in the US. There are around 30 other countries that also operate this system.
The 14th Amendment of the US constitution states that: “All persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
Critics argue that the amendment attracts illegal immigrants to the US to have so-called anchor babies, who as US citizens can later apply for legal status for their entire families, says The Wall Street Journal.
Could Trump abolish it?
The president said he had discussed the matter with legal counsel who advised him that he could end birthright citizenship by executive order.
“It was always told to me that you needed a constitutional amendment,” he said in 2018. “Guess what? You don’t.”
But most legal experts agree it would take a constitutional amendment to end birthright citizenship, something which would require Congressional approval.
“The president cannot erase the Constitution with an executive order,” Omar Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Immigrants’ Rights Project,” told The New York Times last year.
This is a “transparent and blatantly unconstitutional attempt to sow division and fan the flames of anti-immigrant hatred,” he said.
Any attempt to redefine the terms of the 14th Amendment to remove the right of birthright citizenship is likely to meet stiff resistance in the courts, Bloomberg reports.
“Many scholars, including some prominent conservatives, say the issue is settled,” the news site says.
Among them is John Yoo, a former Justice Department official during the George W. Bush administration, who said that courts have been explicit on the matter.
“Anyone born on American territory, no matter their national origin, ethnicity or station in life, is an American citizen,” he said.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
A history of student protest at Columbia University
The Explainer Anti-Israel demonstrations at NYC's Ivy League university echo protests against Vietnam War and South African apartheid
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Trump is ruled in contempt'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Hainault sword attack: police hunt for motive
Speed Read Mental health is key line of inquiry, as detectives prepare to interview suspect
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
'Can we — the people who have bought so much already — really keep buying more?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
'Presidential debates are more performance art than actual ways to inform'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Trump, DeSantis meet for first time since primary
Speed Read The former president and the Florida governor have seemingly mended their rivalry
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Justices set to punt on Trump immunity case
Speed Read Conservative justices signaled support for Trump's protection from criminal charges
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'Biden is smart to keep the border-security pressure on'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Arizona grand jury indicts 18 in Trump fake elector plot
Speed Read The state charged Mark Meadows, Rudy Giuliani and other Trump allies in 2020 election interference case
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'Voters know Biden and Trump all too well'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Who will win the 2024 presidential election?
In Depth Election year is here. Who are pollsters and experts predicting to win the White House?
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published