President Donald Trump has again suggested his administration is working towards ending birthright citizenship, a constitutional right that grants citizenship to all children born in the US, regardless of their parents’ nationality.
“Birthright citizenship, where you have a baby on our land – walk over the border, have a baby, congratulations, the baby’s now a US citizen… it’s frankly ridiculous.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
However, many prominent politicians – including Republicans – are adamant that the President does not have the power to abolish the right, says The Independent.
Trump first brought up the idea of scrapping birthright citizenship during his 2016 presidential campaign, branding it “a magnet for illegal immigration”, reports Time.
He suggested it again ahead of 2018 US midterms. “We’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States for 85 years,” the president claimed, incorrectly, in a TV interview with Axios in October. “It’s ridiculous. It’s ridiculous. And it has to end.”
What is birthright citizenship?
Birthright citizenship is a constitutional right that automatically grants citizenship to children born in the US. There are around 30 other countries that also operate this system.
The 14th Amendment of the US constitution states that: “All persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
Critics argue that the amendment attracts illegal immigrants to the US to have so-called anchor babies, who as US citizens can later apply for legal status for their entire families, says The Wall Street Journal.
Could Trump abolish it?
The president said he had discussed the matter with legal counsel who advised him that he could end birthright citizenship by executive order.
“It was always told to me that you needed a constitutional amendment,” he said in 2018. “Guess what? You don’t.”
But most legal experts agree it would take a constitutional amendment to end birthright citizenship, something which would require Congressional approval.
“The president cannot erase the Constitution with an executive order,” Omar Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Immigrants’ Rights Project,” told The New York Times last year.
This is a “transparent and blatantly unconstitutional attempt to sow division and fan the flames of anti-immigrant hatred,” he said.
Any attempt to redefine the terms of the 14th Amendment to remove the right of birthright citizenship is likely to meet stiff resistance in the courts, Bloomberg reports.
“Many scholars, including some prominent conservatives, say the issue is settled,” the news site says.
Among them is John Yoo, a former Justice Department official during the George W. Bush administration, who said that courts have been explicit on the matter.
“Anyone born on American territory, no matter their national origin, ethnicity or station in life, is an American citizen,” he said.
-
Political cartoons for December 6Cartoons Saturday’s political cartoons include a pardon for Hernandez, word of the year, and more
-
Pakistan: Trump’s ‘favourite field marshal’ takes chargeIn the Spotlight Asim Munir’s control over all three branches of Pakistan’s military gives him ‘sweeping powers’ – and almost unlimited freedom to use them
-
Codeword: December 6, 2025The daily codeword puzzle from The Week
-
‘These accounts clearly are designed as a capitalist alternative’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Boat strike footage rattles some lawmakersSpeed Read ‘Disturbing’ footage of the Sept. 2 attack on an alleged drug-trafficking boat also shows the second strike that killed two survivors who were clinging to the wreckage
-
Is a Putin-Modi love-in a worry for the West?Today’s Big Question The Indian leader is walking a ‘tightrope’ between Russia and the United States
-
Trump pardons Texas Democratic congressmanspeed read Rep. Henry Cuellar was charged with accepting foreign bribes tied to Azerbaijan and Mexico
-
‘It is their greed and the pollution from their products that hurt consumers’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump targets ‘garbage’ Somalis ahead of ICE raidsSpeed Read The Department of Homeland Security will launch an immigration operation targeting Somali immigrants in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area
-
Hegseth blames ‘fog of war’ for potential war crimespeed read ‘I did not personally see survivors,’ Hegseth said at a Cabinet meeting
-
Is a Reform-Tory pact becoming more likely?Today’s Big Question Nigel Farage’s party is ahead in the polls but still falls well short of a Commons majority, while Conservatives are still losing MPs to Reform
