The United Nations has taken the first step towards creating a league table of global governments that conduct the most surveillance on their own citizens.
The 28-question survey, which covers everything from chatroom monitoring to systematic surveillance, begins with a potential five points if a country’s constitution had a provision to protect privacy.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“Other questions range from parliamentary and judicial oversight of surveillance and intelligence activities, profiling of civilians, and the use of 'bulk powers' — such as downloading an entire set of phone records rather than getting a judge’s permission to listen into one call,” says Reuters.
The final question asks: “Does your country have a police and/or intelligence service which systematically profiles and maintains surveillance on large segments of the population in a manner comparable to that of the Stasi in the 1955-1990 GDR (East Germany)?”
The rankings system is part of Cannataci’s wider brief investigating digital privacy, which was created by the Human Rights Council in 2015 in response to the Edward Snowden revelations about US surveillance.
Reuters reports that “the council’s 47 member states are not be obliged to agree with his findings, but special rapporteurs’ reports are generally influential in a forum where governments are keen to appear to have an unblemished human rights record”.
Earlier this month Cannataci slammed plans by the UK government to make it an offence to view terrorist material online just once.
Under the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill, which was granted Royal Assent in mid-February, a maximum penalty for viewing some types of terrorist information – even once – is 15 years imprisonment.
On a visit to the UK, Cannataci said the new law risked “pushing a bit too much towards thought crime”.
The UN official said “the difference between forming the intention to do something and then actually carrying out the act is still fundamental to criminal law… here you're saying: ‘You've read it three times so you must be doing something wrong.”
The Register says government has argued the law still provides for the existing “reasonable excuse defence”, “which includes circumstances where a person ‘did not know, and had no reason to believe’ the material accessed contained terrorist propaganda”.
-
The trial of Jair Bolsonaro, the 'Trump of the tropics'The Explainer Brazil's former president will likely be found guilty of attempting military coup, despite US pressure and Trump allegiance
-
Telephobia: why young people are being taught how to make phone callsIn The Spotlight Young people are so scared of calls that they 'scream' when their phone rings
-
Sudoku medium: September 2, 2025The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
-
China is silently expanding its influence in American citiesUnder the Radar New York City and San Francisco, among others, have reportedly been targeted
-
How China uses 'dark fleets' to circumvent trade sanctionsThe Explainer The fleets are used to smuggle goods like oil and fish
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
What happens if tensions between India and Pakistan boil over?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As the two nuclear-armed neighbors rattle their sabers in the wake of a terrorist attack on the contested Kashmir region, experts worry that the worst might be yet to come
-
Dozens dead in Kashmir as terrorists target touristsSpeed Read Visitors were taking pictures and riding ponies in a popular mountain town when assailants open fired, killing at least 26
-
Why Russia removed the Taliban's terrorist designationThe Explainer Russia had designated the Taliban as a terrorist group over 20 years ago
-
Inside the Israel-Turkey geopolitical dance across SyriaTHE EXPLAINER As Syria struggles in the wake of the Assad regime's collapse, its neighbors are carefully coordinating to avoid potential military confrontations
-
'Like a sound from hell': Serbia and sonic weaponsThe Explainer Half a million people sign petition alleging Serbian police used an illegal 'sound cannon' to disrupt anti-government protests
