America isn't special because it apologizes
Politicians know that Americans want to feel exceptional
America is exceptional in many ways. Apologizing for our sins is not one of them.
In the past week or so, how many times have you heard someone say that what makes America unique among other nations is that even though we are capable of heinous mistakes, we alone have the moral insight to recognize them, to provide an accounting of them, and to change because of them?
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence's report on the CIA's torture program is an "act of self-examination" that "keeps us a model that others want to emulate, partner with, and immigrate to," writes Thomas Friedman. If our official sins are "not exposed and checked, such actions could damage our society as much as a terrorist attack."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Vice President Joe Biden was more effusive: "Think about it. Name me another country that's prepared to stand and say, 'This was a mistake. We should not have done what we've done, and we will not do it again.'"
Sounds comforting. American self-righteousness soothes the burns from blowback. School kids learn that we mistreated Indians and gave them land to atone. They learn that we interned Japanese-Americans and gave them money. They learn that we rebuilt Europe after World War II.
America does absorb and process an unusually large number of its own failures. But we are not unique.
Germany had to exorcize so many demons after Hitler that even free speech is somewhat curtailed.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission after apartheid was flawed and yet still monumental.
The British are as capable as we are of documenting and then correcting abuses. So are the Australians.
Even Khrushchev denounced Stalin.
In some ways, despite the heroic efforts of theologians like Reinhold Niebuhr to recognize in our civic culture a strain of self-recrimination that leads to moral progress, we are not as exceptional as Germany. We recognize that our country was built by slave labor and haven't really figured out how to atone for it.
Better to see, as Peter Beinart does at The Atlantic, that American government perhaps uniquely recognizes how flawed we are as human beings and has found, over time, an efficient and procedurally fair way to ensure that our worst instincts are checked.
There's an acute tension between the intellectual class and the political class about torture. Politicians and intellectuals know that torture is wrong. Intellectuals want accountability in the form of legal redress. The politicians, bearing responsibility for instigating the policies in the first place, want to move on in the easiest way possible.
Public opinion always influences what happens next, and here, the intellectuals are behind the politicians. Politicians know that Americans want to feel special, so they tell us that the way we hold ourselves accountable for our mistakes is some immutable, collective characteristic that we all share.
Usually, atonement includes sacrifice. Practically, our political leaders know that they cannot spread the costs of actual atonement around, because that would be too much to bear. They settle instead for a historical accounting. Is this morally monstrous? Not when politicians are held accountable by voters. Voters will punish politicians who punish them, who drag the country into places that seem too uncomfortable and out of synch with progress.
When Edward Snowden exposed the National Security Agency's surveillance program, the public was quickly outraged, then not, then Congress tinkered with some reforms, then it mostly lost momentum, and then a few journalism prizes were won. Now, while the debate about privacy and surveillance is certainly louder than it was, it is not at all edifying.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Marc Ambinder is TheWeek.com's editor-at-large. He is the author, with D.B. Grady, of The Command and Deep State: Inside the Government Secrecy Industry. Marc is also a contributing editor for The Atlantic and GQ. Formerly, he served as White House correspondent for National Journal, chief political consultant for CBS News, and politics editor at The Atlantic. Marc is a 2001 graduate of Harvard. He is married to Michael Park, a corporate strategy consultant, and lives in Los Angeles.
-
Today's political cartoons - April 21, 2024
Cartoons Sunday's cartoons - devilish decrees, biblical blunders, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 carefully selected cartoons about the Trump-Daniels jury selection process
Cartoons Artists take on a stress-free life, rare peers, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Loire Valley Lodges review: sleep, feast and revive in treetop luxury
The Week Recommends Forest hideaway offers chance to relax and reset in Michelin key-winning comfort
By Julia O'Driscoll, The Week UK Published
-
Why Puerto Rico is starving
The Explainer Thanks to poor policy design, congressional dithering, and a hostile White House, hundreds of thousands of the most vulnerable Puerto Ricans are about to go hungry
By Jeff Spross Published
-
China is now just another autocracy
The Explainer On the long-lasting consequences of Xi Jinping's power grab
By Noah Millman Published
-
Is America the main obstacle to peace in Korea?
The Explainer There's only one way Korea would unify — and the United States won't stand for it
By Noah Millman Published
-
Why on Earth does the Olympics still refer to hundreds of athletes as 'ladies'?
The Explainer Stop it. Just stop.
By Jeva Lange Last updated
-
Berlin's wall and ours
The Explainer What that signifier of the Cold War indicates about our unsettled historical moment
By Noah Millman Published
-
The catastrophe in Yemen
The Explainer A Saudi Arabian blockade has left millions of civilians starving, and without fuel or clean water. What is this conflict about?
By The Week Staff Published
-
China's strongman
The Explainer Xi Jinping is China's most powerful leader in decades. What are his plans for the country — and the world?
By The Week Staff Published
-
How to ride out the apocalypse in a big city
The Explainer So you live in a city and don't want to die a fiery death ...
By Eugene K. Chow Published