Half the country admits it doesn’t understand Obamacare, and Earle Griffis is among them. Griffis, 46, a self-employed commercial fisherman from Milton, Fla., has no health insurance because he cannot afford the $700-per-month premiums he’s been quoted in the past. He has a heart problem and a painful hernia extending from his navel to his rib cage, but receives no medical care. All the scary stuff he’s heard about Obamacare has left him convinced—inaccurately—that policies on the new health-insurance exchanges would cost him more than $700. “I’m really confused, but the one thing I know is that I can’t afford it,” Griffis told the Kaiser Family Foundation/NBC poll. “I guess they’ll have to haul me to jail.”
His fear and confusion doesn’t speak well of the Obama administration’s efforts to sell its signature reform to the public. But the fight to kill Obamacare is doomed until opponents can come up with a better answer to the question: What about Earle Griffis? What does our society do about him, and the tens of millions like him, who now have no choice but to let heart conditions, diabetes, and even cancer go untreated? There’s no point in pretending that the free market will ever provide health insurance that lower- to middle-income people could afford on their own, especially if they have pre-existing conditions. So if the growth of government is to be resisted at all costs, then the only response to the problem of Earle Griffis is to say: tough. Health care is a commodity, not a right. If people can’t pay for it, that’s no one’s problem but their own. This argument has the virtue of intellectual honesty, but it will not be an easy sell.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Expressionists: a 'rousing' exhibition at the Tate ModernThe Week Recommends Show mixes 'ferociously glowing masterpieces' from Kandinsky with less well-known artwork
-
The Mighty Five: a guide to Utah's mesmerizing national parksThe Week Recommends From Arches to Zion, you should wander them all
-
How is your mortgage rate determined?The Explainer The Federal Reserve is partly to blame, but so are various personal financial factors
-
Editor's letter: The launch of Obamacarefeature Blame human nature, not technology, for the epic fail of HealthCare.gov.
-
Editor's letter: The poor health of baby boomers
feature It turns out that while we baby boomers will likely live longer than our parents, we are apt to eke out our final years in more advanced states of decrepitude.
-
Editor's letter: A word about health studies
feature The last time I saw my doctor for a physical, I asked him what he thought about the latest study on diet or somesuch.
-
Editor's letter: Values, votes, and ‘Obamacare’
feature With their pointed comments and loaded questions, the Supreme Court justices revealed either an instinctive approval or distaste for the health-care-reform law.
-
Editor's Letter: America's misery index
feature Maybe a study like the Gallup-Healthways study is what it takes to remind people like me that we may have lost touch, that there is another story worth hearing if we will stop to listen.
-
Editor's Letter: Bob Dole sends his regrets
feature Political gamesmanship and health reform
-
Editor's Letter: A modest proposal
feature For ending the nation's bitter bickering over health care, abortion, affirmative action, religion in the public square, taxation, torture, and the proper role of government
-
Editor's Letter: The health-care debate
feature Knowledge, politics, and health-care legislation