Is ‘Obamacare’ constitutional? Your opinion is as good as mine—or that of any Supreme Court justice. Consider, if you will, the evidence: During the oral arguments on the health-care law’s “individual mandate” last week, four liberal justices seemed quite confident that the mandate—which requires all Americans to have health insurance—was permissible under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause. Four conservative justices apparently were just as certain it was not, with a fifth—Justice Anthony Kennedy—indicating he leaned that way. With their pointed comments and loaded questions, the justices revealed either an instinctive approval or distaste for the law. Legal concepts and precedent were summoned only to justify their gut feelings.
In his new book, The Righteous Mind, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt elegantly explains this phenomenon. Liberals and conservatives see the world so differently, Haidt says, because they hold different values, or “moral intuitions.” Above all else, liberals value economic fairness and care for the less fortunate. They instinctively approve of a law designed to help provide health-care coverage to 30 million uninsured people, many of them poor. So they reason backward to the desired result: Of course it’s constitutional. Conservatives, on the other hand, place far greater value on individual liberty. They are therefore appalled by what they see as the mandate’s unprecedented intrusion on personal choice, and reason backward: Of course it’s unconstitutional. Who’s right? Let’s not pretend the answer will be found in a painstaking parsing of the Commerce Clause. It’s a question of values, and whether your side has the most votes.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Cicada-geddon: the fungus that controls insects like 'zombies'Under The Radar Expert says bugs will develop 'hypersexualisation' despite their genitals falling off
-
'Voters know Biden and Trump all too well'Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Is the Gaza war tearing US university campuses apart?Today's Big Question Protests at Columbia University, other institutions, pit free speech against student safety
-
Editor's letter: The launch of Obamacarefeature Blame human nature, not technology, for the epic fail of HealthCare.gov.
-
Editor's letter: The fight over Obamacare
feature Is health care a commodity or a right?
-
Editor's letter: The poor health of baby boomers
feature It turns out that while we baby boomers will likely live longer than our parents, we are apt to eke out our final years in more advanced states of decrepitude.
-
Editor's letter: A word about health studies
feature The last time I saw my doctor for a physical, I asked him what he thought about the latest study on diet or somesuch.
-
Editor's Letter: America's misery index
feature Maybe a study like the Gallup-Healthways study is what it takes to remind people like me that we may have lost touch, that there is another story worth hearing if we will stop to listen.
-
Editor's Letter: Bob Dole sends his regrets
feature Political gamesmanship and health reform
-
Editor's Letter: A modest proposal
feature For ending the nation's bitter bickering over health care, abortion, affirmative action, religion in the public square, taxation, torture, and the proper role of government
-
Editor's Letter: The health-care debate
feature Knowledge, politics, and health-care legislation