What happened
Egypt’s brief experiment with democracy was on the verge of collapse this week, after the military ousted the country’s Islamist president, and security forces shot dead at least 51 of his Muslim Brotherhood supporters. As Islamist demonstrators staged a sit-in outside a military building where they believed President Mohammed Mursi was being held, government soldiers began shooting into the crowd. “They opened fire on us while we were praying,” said one protester. “They are criminals.” Security officials said they only responded after a “terrorist group” tried to storm the building, and issued an arrest warrant for Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohammed Badie, claiming he had incited the violence.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the editorials said
“There is no ambiguity about what happened in Egypt,” said The Washington Post. A president “who won 51 percent of the vote in a free and fair election” was ousted and arrested by soldiers on orders of generals. That, by definition, is a military coup. So why is President Obama defying the federal law that requires the U.S. to cut off aid to any nation where there’s a military coup? If the U.S. truly believes in democracy, we must suspend our $1.3 billion in aid unless the generals prove that new elections will include “all peaceful political forces, including the Muslim Brotherhood.”
Ending aid to Egypt would be a huge mistake, said The Wall Street Journal. The Obama administration has never exerted any real influence over Egypt, failing to persuade Mubarak to institute even modest democratic reforms, and then failing to restrain Mursi when he tried to build an Islamist dictatorship. “The U.S. now has a second chance to use its leverage to shape a better outcome.” But if Obama cuts our only source of influence with the generals, we won’t be able to stop them from reinstituting a Mubarak-style military dictatorship.
What the columnists said
Mursi’s downfall has proved once again that Islamist ideology is incompatible with democracy, said Michael Hirsh in NationalJournal.com. Mursi—“the first elected Islamist head of state in Arab history”—forced through an unpopular sharia-inspired constitution, cracked down on women’s rights, and arrested opposition activists who dared oppose his will. Outraged by Mursi’s authoritarianism, millions of Egyptians issued their own “Declaration of Independence” by demanding his removal. The generals rightly intervened on their behalf.
Popular or not, this coup sends a dangerous message, said Shadi Hamid in The New York Times. Islamists across the Middle East who renounced terrorism and sought change through politics will now “ask, with good reason, whether democracy has anything to offer them.” Many may decide that the radicals are right, and that change “can’t come through the democracy of ‘unbelievers’; violence is the only path.”
Mursi was ousted primarily because of his incompetence, not his Islamic ideology, said Evelyn Gordon in CommentaryMagazine.com. He did nothing to reverse a 33 percent unemployment rate, revive the ailing tourist industry, or tackle fuel shortages or soaring inflation. And if the next government can’t solve those economic issues, it’ll face similar mass protests. No political party in Egypt—not the liberals or the Islamists—has a serious proposal on how to revive Egypt’s economy, said Walter Russell Mead in The-American-Interest.com. But “Egypt must be governed even if it can’t be governed well.” So the next stage of Egypt’s revolution will be the construction of a “government without hope.” Right now, the army is the only institution capable of this task. When “hope fades, force is what remains.”
-
Critics' choice: Outstanding new Japanese restaurantsFeature An all-women sushi team, a 15-seat listening bar, and more
-
Why do Dana White and Donald Trump keep pushing for a White House UFC match?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The president and the sports mogul each have their own reasons for wanting a White House spectacle
-
'Quiet vacationing': a secret revolt against workplace cultureThe explainer You can be in two places at once
-
Putin’s threat to fracture Ukrainefeature Fears that Russia was building a pretext for an invasion of eastern Ukraine grew, as pro-Kremlin protesters occupied government buildings in three cities.
-
Curbing NSA surveillance
feature The White House said it will propose a broad overhaul of the National Security Agency’s domestic surveillance program.
-
Downsizing the military
feature A new budget plan for the Pentagon would save hundreds of billions of dollars by taking the military off its post-9/11 war footing.
-
Putin ratchets up pressure on Ukraine
feature Russian President Vladimir Putin put 150,000 troops at the Ukraine border on high alert and cut off $15 billion in financial aid.
-
Ukraine on the brink of civil war
feature Ukraine’s capital was engulfed in flames and violence when hundreds of riot police launched an assault on an anti-government protest camp.
-
Ukraine at the breaking point
feature An alliance of opposition groups vowed protests would continue until President Viktor Yanukovych is removed from power.
-
Dim prospects for Syrian talks
feature A long-awaited Syrian peace conference in Montreux, Switzerland, quickly degenerated into a cross fire of bitter accusations.
-
The fight over jobless benefits
feature A bill to restore federal benefits for the long-term unemployed advanced when six Republican senators voted with Democrats.