The Supreme Court ruled this week that police could not bring a drug-sniffing dog onto a suspect’s property without a warrant. In a 5–4 decision, the court decided that using a dog to sniff the interior of a home, even if it did not enter, constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment. The ruling upheld a Florida Supreme Court decision to invalidate a warrant granted after a drug-sniffing dog detected marijuana inside a house from the front porch. A policeman can knock on a door without a warrant, wrote Justice Antonin Scalia, “but introducing a trained police dog to explore the area around the home in hopes of discovering incriminating evidence is something else.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Bolton indictment: Retribution or justice?Feature Trump’s former national security adviser turned critic, John Bolton, was indicted for mishandling classified information after publishing his ‘tell-all’ memoir
-
Chicago: Scenes from a city under siegeFeature Chicago is descending into chaos as masked federal agents target people in public spaces and threaten anyone who tries to document the arrests
-
Young Republicans: Does the GOP have a Nazi problem?Feature Leaked chats from members of the Young Republican National Federation reveal racist slurs and Nazi jokes
