The Supreme Court ruled this week that police could not bring a drug-sniffing dog onto a suspect’s property without a warrant. In a 5–4 decision, the court decided that using a dog to sniff the interior of a home, even if it did not enter, constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment. The ruling upheld a Florida Supreme Court decision to invalidate a warrant granted after a drug-sniffing dog detected marijuana inside a house from the front porch. A policeman can knock on a door without a warrant, wrote Justice Antonin Scalia, “but introducing a trained police dog to explore the area around the home in hopes of discovering incriminating evidence is something else.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Grok in the crosshairs as EU launches deepfake porn probeIN THE SPOTLIGHT The European Union has officially begun investigating Elon Musk’s proprietary AI, as regulators zero in on Grok’s porn problem and its impact continent-wide
-
‘But being a “hot” country does not make you a good country’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Why have homicide rates reportedly plummeted in the last year?Today’s Big Question There could be more to the story than politics
