Is prosecuting Mubarak a mistake?

Egypt's former president is being held accountable for the alleged crimes of his regime. Is that what's best for Egypt — and the world?

Egypt's Hosni Mubarak surrendered without a fight in February, and some worry a full prosecution of the former leader will discourage other dictators from stepping down.
(Image credit: Corbis)

Egypt is investigating ousted President Hosni Mubarak for alleged corruption and human rights abuses, including the deaths of 846 protesters in the attempt by security forces to crush anti-government demonstrations earlier this year. Mubarak, who stepped down Feb. 11, remains hospitalized after a mild heart attack, but the legal preparations are moving ahead quickly. But will Mubarak's trial be a necessary step toward reform, or will it only make it harder to get other stubborn rulers to surrender power?

Making an example of Mubarak will backfire: Whatever the Egyptian people think of Mubarak's rule, says Stephen M. Walt in Foreign Policy, he left power "more-or-less peacefully," and didn't "unleash massive force against anti-government demonstrators" the way Moammar Gadhafi has in Libya. Yet the U.S. is trying to find someone to offer Gadhafi a cushy exile, while Mubarak "winds up in jail (maybe deservedly)." The obvious lesson for future dictators "is 'No more Mr. Nice Guy,' which may not be the message we really want to be sending."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up