Issue of the week: Wal-Mart vs. its female employees
The case against Wal-Mart, which began with six female workers, has grown into a class action on behalf of as many as 1.5 million female employees.
It all started out as “Betty vs. Goliath,” said Elizabeth Olson in CNNMoney.com. In 2001, Betty Dukes, a Wal-Mart cashier in Pittsburg, Calif., and five other female Wal-Mart workers filed a suit charging that the Arkansas-based retailing giant systematically discriminated against women, paying them less than similarly situated men and denying them promotions. The case has since swelled into a class action on behalf of as many as 1.5 million female Wal-Mart employees. The question for the U.S. Supreme Court, which heard arguments in the case last week, is whether there is a legal basis for such a large class. If the justices uphold the suit’s class-action status, Wal-Mart could face billions of dollars in damages. And “because Wal-Mart is such a huge employer, the eventual outcome could set an authoritative standard” for how corporate America pays and promotes its female employees. But if class-action status is denied—as seems likely given the generally skeptical tone struck by some justices in last week’s hearing—each plaintiff would have to “fend for herself legally.” Many women would probably drop their complaints, shrinking Wal-Mart’s financial exposure.
The justices were right to be skeptical, said the New York Daily News in an editorial. A class action on the scale contemplated by the plaintiffs runs counter to our justice system, which “is built on the presentation of specific, individualized allegations and fair opportunity to rebut them with contrary evidence.” What the plaintiffs offer instead are “statistical calculations and sociological mumbo-jumbo.” The lawyers bringing this “preposterous” suit claim that the experiences of Dukes and the five other named plaintiffs represent “the victimization of every woman who works for Wal-Mart,” no matter how dissimilar their individual claims. If the plaintiffs prevail, businesses could be swamped with frivolous suits from “every disgruntled former employee with an ax to grind,” said the Lafayette, Ind., Journal and Courier. We’d have “open season on all big businesses, forcing complicated legal defenses.”
Size doesn’t matter, said Ann Woolner in Bloomberg Businessweek. The company shouldn’t be able to use the fact that it has millions of employees to “insulate it from claims,” especially since the plaintiffs contend that gender discrimination was part of the corporate culture emanating from headquarters. Wal-Mart’s culture is hardly unique, said Chloe Schama in The New Republic. The pay disparity between men and women is “a persistent, and troubling, reality” in this country, where full-time female employees make 80 percent of what men earn. Even after taking “legitimate factors that affect the inequality” of wages into account, “an inexplicable gulf” remains. Let’s not forget that, amid all the questions about the size of the class, sex discrimination is “the core substantive issue” of this precedent-setting case.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
4 ways to give back this holiday season
The Explainer If your budget is feeling squeezed, remember that money is not the only way you can be generous around the holidays
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published
-
4 tips for hosting an ecofriendly Thanksgiving
The Week Recommends Coming together for the holidays typically produces a ton of waste, but with proper preparation, you can have an environmentally friendly gathering.
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Jussie Smollet conviction overturned on appeal
Speed Read The Illinois Supreme Court overturned the actor's conviction on charges of staging a racist and homophobic attack against himself in 2019
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Issue of the week: Who killed the Twinkie?
feature The seemingly imperishable Twinkie has finally met its match, and its name is Big Labor.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Apple’s patent victory over Samsung
feature Apple's “sweeping victory” is among the biggest intellectual-property triumphs on record.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Goldman Sachs’s ‘toxic’ culture
feature Greg Smith’s stinging public resignation from Goldman Sachs landed on Wall Street “like a bomb.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Can a mortgage deal revive housing?
feature Five big banks reached a settlement with state and federal officials to pay $26 billion to offset some of the damage caused by their misdeeds in the foreclosure crisis.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Europe gets downgraded
feature Standard & Poor's lowered the credit rating for nine European nations, indicating that Europe has not yet convincingly dealt with the debt crisis.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Tom Toles: Cartoonist of the Year
feature Meet the winner of The Week's Cartoonist of the Year award
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Cartoonist of the Year finalists
feature A brief look at this year's nominees
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Issue of the week: Calling out the crash’s culprits
feature The Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations has just published its 635-page report on the financial crisis.
By The Week Staff Last updated