Should the U.S. intervene in Libya? The rationale for establishing a “no-fly zone” may seem obvious to some, but Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and the Joint Chiefs of Staff are making it clear they want no part of Libya. To understand the defense establishment’s aversion to another foreign conflict, consider the startling statement Gates made just a few weeks ago. “Any future defense secretary who advises the president to again send a big American land army into Asia or into the Middle East or Africa,” Gates said, “should have his head examined.” Now, Gates is no dove; he’s a career military and intelligence man who has spent his life projecting American power abroad. But in four years of overseeing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Gates has witnessed firsthand the perils of trying to bend fractious tribal nations to our will. We’ve sacrificed the lives of nearly 6,000 Americans, the limbs and psyches of tens of thousands more, and more than $1 trillion. And yet the outcome, in both Iraq and especially Afghanistan, remains in doubt.
That humbling experience does not mandate that the West stand idly by as Muammar al-Qaddafi massacres Libyans. But beware those who see our choice as a simple matter. As Gates has publicly warned, there is no such thing as “surgical” and limited military intervention. Planes get shot down, the unforeseen unfolds, and well-meaning nations can get sucked into the power vacuum created by an autocracy’s collapse. Ten years of war have vividly underlined Colin Powell’s “Pottery Barn” rule: If you break a foreign country, you own it. America, one suspects Gates is reminding the White House, already has enough broken crockery on its mantelpiece.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
'A direct, protracted war with Israel is not something Iran is equipped to fight'Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Today's political cartoons - April 17, 2024Cartoons Wednesday's cartoons - political anxiety, jury sorting hat, and more
-
Arid Gulf states hit with year's worth of rainSpeed Read The historic flooding in Dubai is tied to climate change
-
Editor's letterfeature
-
Editor's letter: Are college athletes employees?
feature The National Labor Relations Board's decision deeming scholarship players “employees” of Northwestern University has many worrying that college sports itself will soon be history.
-
Editor's letter
feature
-
Editor's letter: When a bot takes your job
feature Now that computers can write news stories, drive cars, and play chess, we’re all in trouble.
-
Editor's letter: Electronic cocoons
feature Smartphones have their upside, but city streets are now full of people walking with their heads down.
-
Editor's letter: The real cause of income inequality
feature When management and stockholders pocket all the profits, the middle class falls further behind.
-
Editor's letter: The real reason you’re so forgetful
feature When you consider how much junk we’ve stored in our brains, it’s no surprise we can’t remember our PINs.
-
Editor's letter: Ostentatious politicians
feature The McDonnells’ indictment for corruption speaks volumes about the company elected officials now keep.