Linking autism and the MMR shot: Conclusively false?

The original research that connected autism to a childhood vaccine was deliberately falsified, says the British Medical Journal. Will this finally silence the debate?

Though widely dismissed since its 1998 publication, research linking the MMR vaccine to autism still concerns many parents.
(Image credit: Corbis)

A controversial study linking a childhood vaccine with autism was based on fraudulent information, a new report in the British Medical Journal says. The 1998 paper by Andrew Wakefield, published in the medical journal The Lancet, claimed that giving young kids the MMR shot increased their odds of developing autism, prompting a widespread vaccine scare. Many doctors dismissed the study as flawed, and The Lancet finally retracted it last year, but journalist Brian Deer now claims the study was deliberately falsified. Though Wakefield stands by his findings, many say Deer's evidence ends the debate. Does it?

Case closed. Can we move on? Enough already, says Jennifer LaRue Huget at The Washington Post. This so-called "link" has been "debunked, disclaimed, and now debunked again." Deer makes the case that many of the original subjects — children who supposedly became autistic after receiving the MMR shot — had already manifested documented developmental problems that Wakefield failed to disclose. This controversy has already taken "energy and funds" away from vital research into "autism's true causes." Let's end this discussion now.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up