Warren gets consumer post
President Obama named former Harvard Law School professor Elizabeth Warren to an advisory position in which she will organize the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Sidestepping a Senate confirmation battle, President Obama last week named former Harvard Law School professor Elizabeth Warren to an advisory position in which she will organize a powerful new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The aggressive consumer advocate, 61, won praise from liberals as head of the watchdog panel overseeing the $700 billion bank bailout, but Republicans view her as anti-business and would try to block her nomination as the agency’s director. Republican Sen. James Inhofe said Obama was deliberately circumventing the Senate confirmation process, and called Warren “a czar, unaccountable to Congress and ultimately the people.” With hundreds of employees and a $500 million budget, the consumer protection agency will write and enforce rules governing mortgages, credit cards, and other financial products.
A bankruptcy expert and outspoken consumer champion, Warren “could hardly be more qualified,” said The Boston Globe in an editorial. In fact, it’s just these qualifications that unnerve Republicans. They fear she’ll be “too ardent about protecting consumers from rapacious mortgage writers and credit card companies.”
If she’s so great, why not let her “run the gauntlet of Senate approval?” said Bruce Ackerman in The Wall Street Journal. Instead, President Obama has done an end run around the Constitution by naming her a “special assistant,” thereby depriving the Senate of giving advice and consent on her appointment. During his campaign, Obama railed against “the excesses of the Bush White House.” But that was then. Now, he’s busy making his own contributions to the “imperial presidency.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Well, Obama certainly made “an innovative job offer to Warren,” said Andrew Leonard in Salon.com. While liberals are thrilled to see her temporarily lead the agency, Obama is kidding himself if he thinks opposition to Warren will fade, enabling him to appoint her as the agency’s director next year. After November, the number of Republicans on Capitol Hill will increase. It’ll be even tougher for Warren to win confirmation next year than it is now.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
NSA surveillance ruled unconstitutional
feature A federal judge ruled that the National Security Agency's mass collection of domestic phone data “almost certainly” violates the Constitution.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The gun debate one year after Newtown
feature The first anniversary of the school shootings in Newtown reignited the debate over gun control, as another school shooting occurred in Colorado.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
A gun revolt in Colorado
feature Two Colorado Democrats who helped push through tough new gun-control laws were ousted in a historic recall vote.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The battle over voter ID laws
feature The Obama administration is challenging the right of Texas to enforce rigorous new voting restrictions.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Stricter affirmative action
feature The Supreme Court raised the bar for considering race in university admissions.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Voting Rights Act gutted
feature The Supreme Court struck down a core component of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
A turning point on gay marriage
feature The Supreme Court struck a historic blow in favor of gay rights.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Court approves DNA swabs
feature The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that police are justified in taking DNA samples from anyone who’s arrested.
By The Week Staff Last updated