Drug tests for the unemployed?

Sen. Orrin Hatch doesn't want jobless benefits to go to drug users. But is testing everyone who's out of work in a major recession a good policy?

Should people seeking unemployment benefits be forced to take a urine test?
(Image credit: Corbis)

Setting up a potential clash between privacy advocates and budget hawks, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) is proposing that people applying for welfare or unemployment benefits be tested for drugs before they can collect any cash. Those who fail would be enrolled in state or federal drug rehabilitation programs, creating what Hatch calls "a way to help people get off of drugs to become productive and healthy members of society, while ensuring that valuable taxpayer dollars aren't wasted." Is this a good idea? (Watch a local report about Orrin Hatch's drug-testing proposal)

It's hateful. Hatch should be ashamed: There are so many things wrong with this "offensive" and "ridiculous idea," says Steve Benen in Washington Monthly, but let's focus on the most odious: There's zero connection between drug use and losing your job in a brutal recession, outside of Hatch's "twisted worldview." This takes the GOP's "revulsion of the jobless to new depths."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up