Why did YouTube ban 'We Con the World'?
Was YouTube's removal of an Israeli "attack parody video," which mocks activists killed in the Gaza flotilla raid, a matter of copyright law — or politics?
![A screengrab from the video.](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/5BwLtKYxguqaexWZeFu4VG-465-80.jpg)
YouTube has removed "We Con the World," a spoof clip created by a satirical Israeli website, Latma TV, to mock media coverage of what The Jerusalem Post calls "the Gaza-bound 'aid' flotilla." The music video, which portrays some of those aboard as terrorists, went viral after the Israeli government press office mistakenly sent it to journalists. While YouTube says it is protecting Warner Music's copyright on the original Michael Jackson song "We Are the World," some commentators aren't buying it. Is YouTube attempting to silence critical Israeli activists? (Watch the video below)
Obviously, YouTube is hostile to Israel: Not only is this parody "legal and permissible" under U.S. copyright law, says conservative Israeli journalist Caroline Glick, who helped create the video, but "this is not YouTube's first move to silence Israeli voices." In 2008, when the Israeli Defense Force "began posting combat footage on its channel to bypass the anti-Israel media," the site did the same thing. As our success distributing the video elsewhere will prove, YouTube was "messing with the wrong Jews."
"YouTube silences Latma, removes 'We Con the World'"
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Keep YouTube out of it: "Chances are," says Frances Martel in Mediaite, "YouTube is just trying to keep itself out of trouble by removing a video making light of a tragic situation in which everyone with an opinion is extremely passionate." Either that, or "Warner Music itself wants to stay out of the fray," and forced YouTube "to tag along." They could have simply flagged the video as "inappropriate," but it's no mystery why these companies want out of this fight.
"YouTube removes Israeli flotilla attack parody video for... copyright infringement?"
YouTube is within its rights: Like it or not, says Ed Morrissey in Hot Air, "it’s YouTube’s site, and they can do what they want with it." They "are no more a public utility" than any other website, "and subscribers have to deal with their editorial decisions." That said, "content producers may want to start looking for alternatives to YouTube," so they can better "control where and how their content gets published."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Best romance books to enjoy this Valentine's Day
The Week Recommends Curl up with a book that will warm your heart
By The Week UK Published
-
Modi goes to Washington
The Explainer Indian PM's 'clever' appeasement strategy could secure US president an ally against China and other Brics states
By The Week UK Published
-
Peter Mandelson has been dubbed the 'Prince of Darkness' for his mastery of political intrigue
In the Spotlight New Labour architect, picked for his 'guile, expertise in world affairs and trade issues, and networking skills', on a mission to woo Donald Trump
By The Week UK Published