The news about the fatal clash between Israeli commandos and pro-Palestinian activists on an aid flotilla had barely broken last week when the comments started lighting up Twitter feeds, Facebook updates, blogs, and other media channels. Only the barest facts were known, but that didn’t matter much, because when it comes to the emotional debate over Israel, facts are not essential. So it was with great conviction and sincere outrage that one side could declare that Israel had savagely attacked a convoy of defenseless peace activists, while the other was just as sure that Israel had been provoked by a dangerous mob in common cause with Islamists bent on Israel’s destruction. Soon enough, information would emerge indicating that the story wasn’t so black and white. For starters, the ships had turned down an offer to bring their supplies to an Israeli port for inspection, because the organizers’ agenda included breaking Israel’s blockade of Gaza. And Israel had been warned repeatedly by the U.S. to use “caution and restraint” when dealing with a flotilla full of civilians.
But such details have had little impact on the competing narratives, because information that doesn’t conform is automatically dismissed as propaganda. The complex truth is that the terrorists who run Hamas really are committed to killing Israelis, while innocent Gazans really are suffering under the blockade. But in a conflict this old and this bitter, merely acknowledging the humanity on the other side is a sign of weakness. To those who’ve staked out their positions, it’s the same story every time: noble victims under attack by bloodthirsty monsters.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Is the royal family a security risk?A Chinese spy's access to Prince Andrew has raised questions about Chinese influence in the UK
-
Assad's future life in exileThe Explainer What lies ahead for the former Syrian dictator, now he's fled to Russia?
-
The best panettones for ChristmasThe Week Recommends Supermarkets are embracing novel flavour combinations as sales of the festive Italian sweet bread soar
-
Editor's letterfeature
-
Editor's letter: Are college athletes employees?
feature The National Labor Relations Board's decision deeming scholarship players “employees” of Northwestern University has many worrying that college sports itself will soon be history.
-
Editor's letter
feature
-
Editor's letter: When a bot takes your job
feature Now that computers can write news stories, drive cars, and play chess, we’re all in trouble.
-
Editor's letter: Electronic cocoons
feature Smartphones have their upside, but city streets are now full of people walking with their heads down.
-
Editor's letter: The real cause of income inequality
feature When management and stockholders pocket all the profits, the middle class falls further behind.
-
Editor's letter: The real reason you’re so forgetful
feature When you consider how much junk we’ve stored in our brains, it’s no surprise we can’t remember our PINs.
-
Editor's letter: Ostentatious politicians
feature The McDonnells’ indictment for corruption speaks volumes about the company elected officials now keep.