Reading the federal deficit
What the new White House projections of a $9 trillion, 10-year fiscal deficit mean for our economic health
“We’ve never fretted over budget deficits,” said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial, at least not if they finance tax cuts or “spending to win a war,” but the $9 trillion, 10-year federal deficit forecast by the White House budget office is different. Not only is it driven by domestic spending, it’s also based on “laughably implausible” assumptions, like that Congress will hold spending to the rate of inflation. As things are going now, $9 trillion “may be optimistic.”
“Can we please relax?” said Robert Reich in Salon. Ten-year budget projections are “notoriously irrelevant” and wildly inaccurate. Besides, out of context, “deficits and debts mean just about nothing.” In 1945, federal debt was 120 percent of GDP, but economic growth “tamed” that ratio in a few short years. The only number “worth looking at” is the deficit projection for next year—$1.6 trillion—which, given our bad jobless numbers, seems “alarmingly small.”
Small? America’s fiscal situation is an unsustainable, “dreadful mess,” said James Pethokoukis in Reuters. Not that Americans are much help—we need to choose between higher taxes or smaller government, but “a fair reading of the polls” shows we “sort of want both” lower taxes and more government services. And our “politicians are certainly no better.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Well, they need to step up, said The Washington Post in an editorial. The Obama White House “has a point” that more than half of the $9 trillion deficit stems from Bush-era tax cuts, wars, and other policies, but it’s “time to stop crying ‘we inherited it.’” Obama needs his own “clear, credible plan” to restore fiscal sustainability.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Big Tech's answer for AI-driven job loss: universal basic income
In The Spotlight A new study reveals the strengths and limitations
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'I will not be silent' on Gaza, says Kamala Harris
Speed Read In a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Harris supported Israel's right to defend itself while expressing a desire to end Palestinian suffering
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
'How long can TikTok dominate as a social network?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published