Lawmaker embroiled in spy case
Rep. Jane Harman was overheard on a federal wiretap saying that she would seek leniency for two pro-Israel lobbyists, then under investigation for espionage, in exchange for help in securing the chairmanship of the Intelligence Committee.
A leading House Democrat was overheard on a federal wiretap saying that she would seek leniency for two pro-Israel lobbyists, then under investigation for espionage, in exchange for help in securing the chairmanship of the Intelligence Committee, unnamed intelligence officials claimed this week. According to the officials, who were quoted in Congressional Quarterly Online and The New York Times, Rep. Jane Harman of California was recorded by the National Security Agency in 2005 during its investigation into the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Two AIPAC lobbyists and a Pentagon official were later charged with espionage.
Harman, who was passed over for the chairmanship, vigorously denied the accusations, saying she’d contacted no one in the Bush administration in behalf of the lobbyists. She also asked U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to release the full wiretap transcripts and to “investigate possible wiretapping of other members of Congress and selective leaks of investigative material.”
These leaks have politics written all over them, said Laura Rozen in Foreign Policy Online. Just as the Obama administration unveils Bush-era memos on harsh interrogation techniques, “Bush-era intelligence officials” are suddenly blabbing to the press, painting a target on the back of a prominent Democrat. These leakers may be sending a warning to Democrats—if you come after us, we’ll come after you.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
That’s one possibility, said Tim Rutten in the Los Angeles Times. Another is that critics of Israel are worried that the AIPAC prosecution may be falling apart, and they want to keep the heat on by dragging in Harman, a prominent Israel backer. That certainly would explain why “three years after the fact,” we’re hearing about these conversations—which, by the way, were merely described by sources. No actual transcripts have turned up.
Regardless, these accusations are enormously troubling, as is Harman’s reaction, said David Corn in CQPolitics.com. She has said both that she can’t recall any conversation with a “suspected Israeli agent,” and also that this person was “an American citizen.” If she can’t recall the conversation, how does she know it was with an American? This merits a serious investigation.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
NSA surveillance ruled unconstitutional
feature A federal judge ruled that the National Security Agency's mass collection of domestic phone data “almost certainly” violates the Constitution.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The gun debate one year after Newtown
feature The first anniversary of the school shootings in Newtown reignited the debate over gun control, as another school shooting occurred in Colorado.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
A gun revolt in Colorado
feature Two Colorado Democrats who helped push through tough new gun-control laws were ousted in a historic recall vote.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The battle over voter ID laws
feature The Obama administration is challenging the right of Texas to enforce rigorous new voting restrictions.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Stricter affirmative action
feature The Supreme Court raised the bar for considering race in university admissions.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Voting Rights Act gutted
feature The Supreme Court struck down a core component of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
A turning point on gay marriage
feature The Supreme Court struck a historic blow in favor of gay rights.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Court approves DNA swabs
feature The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that police are justified in taking DNA samples from anyone who’s arrested.
By The Week Staff Last updated