Stimulus politics

Why Republicans are betting against Obama’s recovery plan

Last week, President Obama “ushered in the post-partisan era,” said Dana Milbank in The Washington Post. On Tuesday he met with House Republicans to discuss his $825 billion economic stimulus plan, and “it looks as if the post-post-partisan era is already upon us.” After the meetings, GOP lawmakers “said very nice things” about Obama, but 12 or fewer are expected to back the bill—far short of Obama's goal.

Obama’s insistence on broad bipartisan support for the stimulus bill is “clever,” said Ericka Andersen in Culture11, but so far his idea of bipartisanship “just means hoping Republicans will agree with him.” They don’t—most genuinely think broad tax cuts, not spending, is the right strategy, and the bill’s $300 billion in “tax relief” isn’t enough to win them over.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Well, so far, that seems to be the Republican plan, said Josh Marshall in Talking Points Memo. And really, they could be right “that only failure will work for them politically.” If Obama’s stimulus bill “is judged a success,” they won’t get much credit. But they could get political milage by criticizing the bill, pushing for “as many non-stimulus inducing tax cuts as possible,” then voting against the final bill “en masse.”

“I’m actually delighted that the GOP is back to what it does best,” said Andrew Sullivan in The Atlantic online: “being an all-round grinch when it comes to spending.” But it is also heartening to see a president “happy to walk the halls of Congress for the public good.” That was missing under Bush, even with House Republicans. With “less ego” in the White House, maybe Washington will get more done.