Unanswered anthrax questions

Different views on why the FBI has a flimsy case against Bruce Ivins

The FBI’s case claiming that government anthrax scientist Bruce Ivins was solely responsible for the 2001 anthrax letter attacks has a “seemingly powerful narrative,” said biological weapons expert Richard Spertzel in The Wall Street Journal, but an implausible one. Ivins could not have produced anthrax of that type and potency at his Army research lab without “many other people being aware of it,” and without equipment the lab doesn’t have.

Guilty or innocent, said The Hartford Courant in an editorial, Ivins—who killed himself—does seem to have been the “victim of overzealous investigation,” much like previous FBI main suspect Steven Hatfill. Ivins was a quiet, respected microbiologist for 18 years, until the FBI put him in a “pressure-cooker” and forced him to retire. Given how the FBI botched the Hatfill investigation, “it’s in the realm of possibility” that Ivins “was hounded to death.”

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up