Afghanistan: The Taliban’s bloody resurgence
The situation in Iraq continues to improve, but the picture in Afghanistan is darkening rapidly.
America’s “other” war is looking more and more like the main event, said USA Today in an editorial. While the situation in Iraq continues to improve—albeit with maddening slowness—the picture in Afghanistan is darkening rapidly. The Taliban and al Qaida have regrouped, their numbers swollen with new recruits, while the weak Afghan government grows ever more precarious. Suicide- and car-bombings are on the rise, and this week, in the deadliest single attack on U.S. forces since 2005, militants armed with automatic weapons and rocket-propelled grenades launched a furious attack on a U.S. outpost in Kunar province, killing nine American soldiers. None of this would be happening, said The New York Times, if President Bush hadn’t siphoned away troops and resources from Afghanistan to launch his “disastrous war of choice in Iraq.” The time has come to send our troops back to where they should
have been all along: in Afghanistan, fighting the people who attacked us on 9/11.
Who says we must choose? said Christopher Hitchens in Slate.com. A “liberal consensus” is emerging that “we can only face our enemies in one place at a time,” and we should therefore end the Bad War in Iraq and send all our troops to the Good War in Afghanistan. Needless to say, things aren’t quite that simple. Many of the people we’re fighting in Iraq—such as “the horrific but now deceased Abu Musab al-Zarqawi”—also fought us in Afghanistan; for Islamic terrorists, this is a war with many fronts. For another thing, “many of the most successful drives against the Taliban have been conducted by American forces redeployed from Iraq,” using counterinsurgent tactics learned in the streets of Baghdad and Anbar province. In other words, those who would “play off the two wars against each other” are engaging in “a small-minded and zero-sum exercise” that bears little relation to the actual world.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But one lesson both these wars have taught us, said Fran Quigley in the Indianapolis Star, is that military power has its limits. In Afghanistan, the Taliban resurgence is being fueled partly by resentment of U.S. airstrikes, which have killed scores of innocent Afghan civilians. When we kill and terrorize civilians, it actually creates sympathy and legitimacy for Islamic extremists. So why are Americans arguing over which war deserves more troops? Afghanistan, like Iraq, will be stabilized mostly by smart economic, diplomatic, and political tactics—not by more troops, more firefights, and more bombing raids.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published