As the housing crisis worsens, said Maeve Reston in the Los Angeles Times, the presidential candidates have forcefully jumped into the fray. Last week, Republican John McCain and Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama all gave major economic-policy addresses, and while McCain differed from the Democrats on most issues, nowhere was that difference more stark than in their proposed responses to the mortgage meltdown. Both Clinton and Obama laid out multibillion-dollar plans to aid homeowners facing foreclosure; McCain offered a stern warning that the government shouldn’t necessarily rescue homeowners or lenders who get in over their heads. “It is not the duty of government to bail out and reward those who act irresponsibly,” McCain said, “whether they are big banks or small borrowers.” Instead, he called for the Federal Housing Authority to gradually increase down-payment requirements for the mortgages that it insures. He also said that as president, he would convene a meeting of mortgage lenders, who, he said, “should pledge to do everything possible to keep families in their homes and businesses growing.”
As befitting Democrats, the Clinton and Obama plans envision a much greater role for government, said Anne E. Kornblut and Jon Cohen in The Washington Post. Clinton “has lashed herself to the issue of homeowner security,” proposing $30 billion for individual homeowners and communities. Under her plan, states and cities could use the aid to buy foreclosed properties and convert them to low-income or rental housing. Obama wants to establish a $10 billion fund that would offer federal guarantees to lenders who convert adjustable-rate mortgages to 30-year fixed-rate loans. Both Democrats also are calling for tighter regulation of mortgage companies.
Obama insists that he’s not proposing a bailout, but I don’t buy it, said Jim Geraghty in National Review Online. After all, “taxpayers are on the hook for repaying those refinanced mortgages if the homeowner doesn’t.” But Obama can’t call his plan by its true name, “because the actual details of the plan would be phenomenally unpopular.” Polls show that more than half of Americans oppose aid to those who borrowed more than they could afford. Clinton’s plan should also worry taxpayers, but for different reasons, said Peter Viles in LATimes.com. Under her proposal, we’d essentially be trusting municipalities to invest in real estate, with $30 billion in taxpayer money. “Imagine the bungling, the fraud, and the favoritism.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
At least the Democrats understand that without government intervention, millions more Americans will suffer, said Daniel Gross in Slate.com. McCain does not deny that there’s a housing crisis and that people are hurting. “But his solution to an era in which financial deregulation set the stage for federal bailouts, rampant speculation, and reckless lending is ... less regulation.” As for homeowners, under McCain’s way, they “should just put up more money for down payments and work harder to keep current” on their mortgages. I guess we have to give him credit for “straight talk.” But his plan is neither good policy nor smart politics. Many swing states, including Florida and Nevada, have been ravaged by the housing crisis. “Besides, he’s already got the ‘let-them-eat-cake’ vote sewed up.”
-
Savages: a tragi-comedy set in a 'quirky handcrafted world'The Week Recommends This new animated film by Oscar-nominated filmmaker Claude Barras is undeniably political, but it has a hopeful message
-
Why 'faceless bots' are interviewing job huntersIn The Spotlight Artificial intelligence is taking over a crucial part of recruitment
-
Who will win the battle for the soul of the Green Party?An ideological divide is taking root among the environmentalists
-
Issue of the week: The latest fix for the euro crisisfeature The head of the European Central Bank announced an unlimited bond-buying plan for troubled euro zone countries.
-
Issue of the week: The return of the euro crisis
feature The euro crisis is back with a vengeance, and it will be with us “for many years” to come.
-
Issue of the week: Europe’s latest crisis fix
feature The agreements reached last week will create a fiscal union in Europe by allowing the EU to oversee members' national budgets and impose limits on deficits and spending.
-
Issue of the week: Greece inflames the debt crisis
feature “Not since the night when soldiers emerged from the belly of a giant wooden horse in ancient Troy has Greece engineered a more stunning surprise,” said an editorial at The Washington Post.
-
Issue of the week: Who caused the financial crisis?
feature The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission appointed by Congress completed its report on the “culprits” involved in “the traumatic events of 2008.”
-
Making a fetish of democracy
feature From Iraq to Afghanistan and beyond, Washington remains in thrall to the idea that democratization will make other nations more peaceful and reliable allies. It isn't true.
-
France's nuclear solution
opinion What if there were a way to get around nuclear energy's big problem— radioactive waste? There is.
-
Nuclear Iran? Get used to it
feature