Washington, D.C.
The U.S. Supreme Court this week declined to wade into the national debate on gay marriage. The justices refused to hear a challenge to a 2003 Massachusetts high court ruling requiring the state to recognize same-sex marriages. Lawyer Erik Stanley of the conservative Liberty Counsel said the Supreme Court setback was just a “minor skirmish,” and promised that conservatives would now push even harder for a federal constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman. Arline Isaacson of Gay and Lesbian Advocates said the Supreme Court was right to let the state run its own affairs, but she didn’t expect the debate to die. “Our opponents are rabid,” she said. “They’re not going to give up.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
5 timely cartoons about climate change denialCartoons Artists take on textbook trouble, bizarre beliefs, and more
-
Kris Kristofferson: the free-spirited country music star who studied at OxfordIn the Spotlight The songwriter, singer and film-star has died aged 88
-
The Chagos agreement explainedIn Depth Ceding the islands to Mauritius could allow China to gain foothold in the Indo-Pacific, experts have warned
